SANDEEP SHARMA
Het Ram – Appellant
Versus
Gurdass Ram – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sandeep Sharma, J.
By way of instant petition filed under Section 482 Cr.PC, prayer has been made on behalf of the petitioner, who stands convicted of his having committed offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in criminal Case No. 260-III/17/13, Gurdass Ram v. Het Ram, for compounding the offence under Section 147 of the Act.
2. Precisely, the facts of the case as emerge from the record are that respondent No.1 instituted proceedings under Section 138 of the Act in the court of learned JMFC-3, District Mandi, H.P. alleging therein that accused with a view to discharge his liability, issued cheque amounting to Rs. 2,60,000/-, but fact remains that aforesaid cheque on its presentation to the bank concerned, was dishonoured. Since petitioner-accused failed to make the payment good within the time stipulated in the legal notice, respondent/complainant was compelled to initiate proceedings before the competent Court of law under Section 138 of the Act.
3. Learned trial Court on the basis of material adduced on record by the respective parties, vide judgment dated 31.3.2018, held the petitioner-accused guilty of having committed offence under Section 138 of t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.