RANJAN SHARMA
Manohar Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Ranjan Sharma, J.)
Notice. Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 & 2.
2. With the consent of the parties, the instant writ petition is taken up for disposal, at this stage, in view of the peculiar facts as borne out from the pleadings.
3. The petitioner has filed the instant writ petition with the following prayer(s):-
4. The case of the petitioners is that they were appointed as Lecturers (College Cadre) in subjects of History, Mathematics, Chemistry, Biology and Hindi on different dates as mentioned in Para 3 of the writ petition in 95% Government Aided Privately Managed College i.e. Shri Vishnu S.D. College, Bhatoli, District Una. The petitioners retired from the service of the aforesaid college on attaining the age of superannuation on 31.03.2017, 30.06.2018, 31.03.2012, 31.03.2016 and 29.02.2000 as mentioned in Para 4 of the writ petition.
5. The question as to whether the teachers of 95% Government Aided Privately Man
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.