SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(HP) 456

RANJAN SHARMA
Chander Kanta – Appellant
Versus
State of HP – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Arun Kumar.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol.

JUDGMENT :

(Ranjan Sharma, J.)

Notice. Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.

2. With the consent of the parties, the instant writ petition is taken up for disposal, at this stage, in view of the order intended to be passed herein.

3. The petitioner, being a Trained Graduate Teacher with the respondents-State and presently posted as such in GSSS Sanjauli, has filed the instant petition seeking the following relief:-

    “That the respondents may kindly be directed to treat the petitioner as regular employee of the respondent state from her initial appointment for all intent and purposes i.e. seniority, pay, increments, promotion, leave encashment etc. which are consequences of appointment or petitioner may kindly be regularized on completion of five years on 6th November 2013 when she completed the five years’ service with all consequential benefits in the interest of justice.”

4. In terms of the prayer so made, learned counsel for the petitioner confines his claim only to the extent that the petitioner may be treated to have been appointed as Trained Graduate Teacher (Arts) on regular basis from the date she

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top