Back
VIVEK SINGH THAKUR, SANDEEP SHARMA
Bimla Devi – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sandeep Sharma, J
Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with judgment dated 25.04.2018 passed by learned Single Judge, whereby CWP No.8967 of 2012, titled as Smt. Bimla Devi and others vs. State Bank of India and others, having been filed by predecessor-in- interest of the appellants (hereinafter referred to as the petitioner), laying therein challenge to order dated 31.03.2011 passed by Reviewing Committee, thereby rejecting the revision/ appeal having been filed against order dated 26.02.2010, passed by Appellate Authority, confirming order of Disciplinary Authority, thereby imposing punishment of dismissal from service, petitioners have approached this Court in the instant Letters Patent Appeal, praying therein to set-aside aforesaid impugned judgment.
2. For having bird’s eye view, facts relevant for adjudication of the case at hand, are that predecessor-in-interest of the petitioners i.e. Tej Ram Banger joined the services of the respondent-bank as Clerk-cum-Cashier on 20.07.1977 and thereafter, he was promoted to the post of Junior Manager Scale-I, Middle Management Scale-II and Middle Management scale-III in the years 1988, 1996 and 2002, respectively. Vide communication
(1) Dismissal--Standard of proof required in criminal proceedings being different from standard of proof required in departmental enquiries, same charges and evidence may lead to different results in....
The High Court can interfere with the quantum of punishment if it is found to be disproportionate to the gravity of the offence, but must assign reasons for finding the punishment to be shocking to i....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for reasons in the decision-making process, adherence to the principles of natural justice, and the limited scope of judicial revie....
Disciplinary proceedings against a retired bank officer can proceed if initiated prior to retirement, identifying lapses in loan sanctioning as misconduct warranting penalties.
The court emphasized the limited scope of judicial review in disciplinary proceedings, highlighting the discretionary power of the disciplinary authority to impose appropriate punishment and the impo....
Disciplinary proceedings against bank employees must adhere to established regulations, and decisions upheld by the appellate authority are not subject to re-evaluation by the High Court unless deeme....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
