SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(HP) 555

AJAY MOHAN GOEL
Sanjeev Kumar alias Sanjeev Raizada – Appellant
Versus
Yudhvir Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ashok Sud, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Khem Raj.
For the Respondent: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri.

JUDGMENT :

(Ajay Mohan Goel, J.)

By way of this petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Court of learned Senior Civil Judge, Court No. 1, Una, District Una, in case No. 184/2017, titled as Sanjeev Kumara alias Sanjeev Raizada vs. Yudhvir Singh, in terms whereof, an application filed by the petitioner under Order 26, Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure before the learned Trial Court for appointment of the Local Commissioner has been dismissed.

2. Brief facts necessary for the adjudication of the present petition are that the petitioner/plaintiff (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the plaintiff’) has filed a suit against the respondent herein (defendant in the suit) for permanent injunction to the effect that respondent does not interfere or encroach upon or carry out any construction on the suit land by dispossessing the plaintiff forcibly. This suit was filed in the month of May, 2017.

3. During the pendency of the suit, an application was filed by the plaintiff under Order 26, Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, in January, 2019, praying for the appointment of a Local Commissioner, being a revenue expert, t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top