RAKESH KAINTHLA
Sanjeev Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Rakesh Kainthla, J.)
The petitioner has filed the present petition for seeking the quashing of the order dated 14.09.2022, passed by learned Special Judge, Una, District Una, H.P. It has been asserted that FIR No. 289/2015, dated 18.9.2015 was registered for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 341, 354 and 506 of IPC and Section 3(I)(XI) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 on the complaint of the wife of the present petitioner. She died on 17.11.2021. The trial is pending before learned Special Judge, Una. The accused stated while recording his statement under Section 313 of Cr.P.C. on 14.9.2022 that he wanted to lead evidence in defence. He exhibited certain documents as Ex.R-1 to R-16. These documents were taken on record and the matter was listed for arguments. Learned Public Prosecutor had also not objected to the exhibition of the documents. The petitioner came to know of the exhibiting of the documents from the letter written by the District Attorney to the Director, Prosecution on 16.9.2022. The petitioner filed an application for adjournment of his case. The learned Trial Court had wrongly exhibited t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.