VIVEK SINGH THAKUR, SANDEEP SHARMA
Kamlesh Thakur – Appellant
Versus
Sushil Thakur – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sandeep Sharma, J.
Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with judgment dated 14.8.2019, passed by the learned District Judge, (Family Court) Shimla, District Shimla in HMA Petition No. 5-S/3 of 2019/14, whereby petition filed under Section 13 (1) (i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act (herein after referred to as “the Act”), praying therein for decree of divorce by way of dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty having been filed by the respondent-husband came to be allowed, appellant-wife has approached this Court in the instant appeal filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act read with Section 28 of the Act, praying therein to set-aside the aforesaid judgment.
2. For having bird’s eye view, facts which may be relevant for adjudication of the case at hand are that marriage inter-se parties to the lis was solemnized on 10.5.2005 at village Ani, as per Hindu Rites and ceremonies and out of their wedlock, one daughter named Ms. Swastika was born on 8.3.2006. Though initially, parties to the lis lived together cordially, but subsequently, on account of certain differences, marital relations inter-se them became sour. Father of the respondent-husband was compelled to reside a
Ravi Kumar versus Julmi Devi 2010 (4) SCC 476.
Vijay Kumar Ramchandra Bhate v. Neela Vijay Kumar Bhate (2003) 6 SCC 334
The court affirmed that the evidence of persistent cruelty justified the dissolution of marriage under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, establishing a clear breakdown of the marital relat....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the marriage bond can be considered broken irretrievably due to mental cruelty, loss of mutual trust and faith, and the refusal to share the b....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that to prove cruelty for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, instances of cruelty must be established with specific reference to date, time, pla....
The main legal point established is that prolonged separation, false accusations, and reluctance for sexual relations can constitute cruelty under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that mental cruelty in matrimonial matters must be of such a nature that the parties cannot reasonably be expected to live together, and the intent....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.