RANJAN SHARMA
Kewal Verma – Appellant
Versus
Himachal Road Transport Corporation – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ranjan Sharma, J.
Notice. Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht, learned Standing Counsel, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondents.
2. With the consent of the parties, the instant writ petition is taken up for disposal, at this stage.
3. The petitioner, a Conductor in the Respondent-Corporation has filed the instant writ petition, seeking the following reliefs:-
(ii) That the respondents may further be directed to pay arrears alongwith interest @ 9% w.e.f. 08.08.2008 from the date his services are entitled to be regularized.”
4. The petitioner, was appointed as a Conductor, in the Respondent-Corporation, on contract basis, under the kith and kin policy on 08.08.2008 and his services were regularized by the Corporation w.e.f. 09.07.2015. Now, the grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner is entitle
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.