Back
M. S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, JYOTSNA REWAL DUA
State of H. P. – Appellant
Versus
Chaman Lal Bali – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
JYOTSNA REWAL DUA, J.
1. This petition seeking review of the judgment passed on 17.11.2022 in LPA No. 517 of 2012 is barred by 207 days.
2. Background/facts:
(ii) LPA No 517 of 2012 was preferred by the review petitioner against the aforesaid judgment. The appeal was disposed of on 30.10.2018 alongwith other connected matters with certain modifications in the relief allowed to respondent No. 1.
(iii) The State (present review petitioner) filed review petition No. 101 of 2019 seeking review of the judgment passed on 30.10.2018 in LPA No. 517 of 2012. The sole ground was that respondent No. 1 (writ petitioner) did not possess educational qualification required under the R&P Rules, hence was not entitled to the relief granted to him. In view of the ground urged, review was allowed on 20.08.2021 and consequently LPA No. 517 of 2012 was restored to its
The court emphasized that a litigant cannot be permitted to take inconsistent, contradictory & shifting stands in the same case at his whims & fancies and cannot file successive review petitions for ....
Point of Law : As per Notification issued in 1994 and as per subsequent Notification in 2007, the candidates having Ph.D. degree in the concerned subject are exempted from NET for PG level.
Review jurisdiction under CPC is limited to correcting errors apparent on the record; it cannot be used to reargue settled issues.
Point of law : That a person, who did not diligently prosecute his cause cannot claim any monetary benefit from an anterior datePrinciple of res judicata is a doctrine to be invoked in public interes....
The court affirmed that prior non-teaching service can be considered for promotion under the CAS if the roles are deemed equivalent, as per UGC guidelines.
A review petition must demonstrate an error apparent on the face of the record to warrant reconsideration of a judgment; mere repetition of previous arguments does not suffice.
A review of a judgment can only be granted on the basis of new and important evidence or an error apparent on the face of the record; findings that arise after the judgment do not constitute valid gr....
A review petition must demonstrate an error apparent on the face of the record; mere dissatisfaction with a decision does not warrant a review.
Review jurisdiction is strictly confined to evident errors; reiteration of previously dismissed arguments does not justify a review.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
