IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Ranjan Sharma, J.
Sunil Kumar - Petitioner
Vs.
M/s Anand Automobile and Anr. - Respondents
Cr. Revision No. 204 of 2024
Decided On : 08-04-2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for condonation of delay in filing. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court confirms the compounding of offenses as a valid resolution. (Para 12 , 18 , 19) |
| 3. final ruling quashing previous judgments and ordering release. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
JUDGMENT :
Ranjan Sharma, J.
Cr.MP(M) No. 628 of 2024
This is an application under Section 5 of Limitations Act, praying for condonation of 1 year 7 months and 26 days, of delay in filing the accompany Criminal Revision Petition. Para 2 of the application narrate the sequel of events, leading to the aforesaid delay, as the petitioner-accused could not arrange the amount due to financial stringency. The reasons mentioned in the application, explaining the delay, appear to be bonafide and unintentional.
2. On issuance of notice on this application on 3.4.2024, Mr. Anubhav Chopra, Advocate, has put in appearance on behalf of Respondent No.1 [M/s Anand Automobile NH-20 Bodh, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P].
Mr. Anubhav Chopra, Advocate, on instructions, at the very outset submits that the Respondent No.1-Complainant/non-applicant does not intend to pursue the matter/proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and states that he has no objection to the aforesaid application.
3. Moreover, since respondent No.2-State is a formal party-respondent in the instant proceedings, originating under the statute i.e. Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [hereinafter referred to as ‘Act’] therefore, the respondent No.2 not file any reply or objection to the said application. The application stands disposed of.
4. In these circumstances, the instant application i.e. Cr.MP(M) No. 628 of 2024, is allowed and the delay of 1 year 7 months and 26 days is condoned.
Cr.MP No. 1173 of 2024
5. This is an application by the petitioner-accused [Sunil Kumar] under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying for quashing the impugned judgment dated 27.11.2018 passed by the Learned Trial Court which was, affirmed by the Learned Appellate Court 08.07.2022, that the matter has been settled with the Respondent No.1-Complainnat [as per Paras No.3 and 5 of application] just to maintain good relations inter se the parties.
On listing of the case today, on 8th April, 2024, Mr. Anubhav Chopra, learned counsel for Respondent No.1-Complainnt, on instructions, does not dispute this position and confirms that the matter has been amicably resolved.
6. In these circumstances, the instant application i.e. Cr.MP No.1173 of 2024 is allowed.
Cr.MP No. 1153 of 2024
7. On 06.04.2024, the Respondent No.1-Complainant/applicant-[M/s Anand Automobile NH-20 Bodh, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P.] has filed two applications, which were under Section 482 Cr.PC and Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which was taken up today [on 8th April, 2024]. In Paras 3 to 5 of the application, it was stated that the Respondent-Complainant has received entire payment and has decided to amicably settle the matter and nothing is now due/recoverable from the petitioner-accused. It is further averred in Paras 5 and 6 of the application, that the matter has been amicably resolved just to keep good relations between the petitioner and Respondent No.1, and accordingly the prayer for quashing the judgment(s) passed by the Learned Trial Court dated 27.11.2018, which was affirmed by the learned Appellate Court on 8.7.2022 has been made.
Cr. Revision No. 204 of 2024
8. The petitioner-accused [Sunil Kumar] has filed the instant Criminal Revision Petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure; assailing the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 27.11.2018 passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.II, Nurpur, District Kangra, (HP), [hereinafter referred to as ‘Trial Court’] whereby, the petitioner-accused [Sunil Kumar] was imposed simple imprisonment for six months for offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and to pay compensation of Rs 6,00,000/- [Rupees Six Lak
Meters and Instruments Private Limited and another Versus Kanchan Mehta
Goaplast (P) Ltd. v. Chico Ursula D'Souza
Vinay Devanna Nayak v. Ryot Sewa Sahakari Bank Ltd.
M. Abbas Haji v. T.N. Channakeshava
H.N. Jagadeesh v. R. Rajeshwari
P. Mohanraj and Others versus Shah Brothers Ispat Private Limited
Damodar S. Prabhu v. Sayed Babalal H.
JIK Industries Ltd. v. Amarlal V. Jumani
Kaushalya Devi Massand v. Roopkishore Khore
Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v. State of Maharashtra
Frick India Ltd. v. Union of India (1990) 1 SCC 400 : 1990 SCC (Tax) 185
Forage & Co. v. Municipal Corpn. of Greater Bombay (1999) 8 SCC 577
Lafarge Aggregates & Concrete India (P) Ltd. v. Sukarsh Azad
Rajneesh Aggarwal v. Amit J. Bhalla
Mrs. Shakuntala Sawhney vs. Mrs. Kaushalya Sawhney and others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of promoting compromise and securing the ends of justice, especially in cases where the accused has remitted the entire liability an....
Generally the powers available under Section 482 of the Code would not have been exercised when a statutory remedy under the law is available, however considering the peculiar set of facts and circum....
Dishonoured of Cheque - Amicable Settlement - Guidelines as laid down in case of Damodar S. Prabhu (Supra) and taking into account fact that parties have settled dispute amicably, in view of this cou....
The court holds that offences under the Negotiable Instruments Act can be compounded at any stage of the proceedings, reaffirming their compensatory nature over punitive.
The offenses under the Negotiable Instruments Act, particularly Section 138, can be compounded at any stage, and the High Court has the inherent power to quash convictions to secure justice when a co....
Offences under the Negotiable Instruments Act can be compounded at any stage, including post-conviction, emphasizing the compensatory nature of the law over punitive measures.
The High Court can annul convictions under the Negotiable Instruments Act based on joint compromises, emphasizing compensatory justice over punitive measures in cheque dishonour cases.
Compounding of offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can be permitted at any stage, including post-conviction, emphasizing compensatory justice over punitive measures.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.