JUDGMENT :

Sandeep Sharma, J.

Precisely, the facts of the case as emerge from the record are that the predecessor-in-interest of the respondent herein purchased 10 biswas of land comprised in Khasra No.958/2/1 and 958/3/1, kita-2, area measuring 2-9 bighas, but since on the basis of sale deed executed at that relevant time, entries were not being made in the revenue record, predecessor-in-interest of the respondent herein filed civil suit No.4/1/2011, titled as Sudershan Bhatia vs. Om Dutt alias Uma Dutt and others, seeking therein declaration that she is owner in possession of the suit land, as detailed hereinabove. Aforesaid suit came to be partly decreed vide judgment and decree dated 4.10.2012 passed by Civil Judge (Senior Division) Court No.1, Shimla, H.P. Since aforesaid judgment and decree never came to be laid challenge in the superior court of law, same attained finality and ultimately on the basis of the same, land in question, came to be mutated in the name of predecessor-in-interest of the respondent herein vide mutation No.54, attested on 6.10.2015. On the basis of aforesaid entries in the revenue record, predecessor-in-interest and thereafter, respondent herein came to