RAKESH KAINTHLA
Rajinder Ghazta – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rakesh Kainthla, J.
The petitioner was declared a proclaimed offender in a case titled Nisha versus Rajinder Gazta for the commission of an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC)-III, Shimla. The police arrested him on 6.6.2022 at 8.00 PM, He was produced before the Court. The Court remanded him to custody till 7.6.2022 and advised the registration of FIR for the commission of an offence punishable under Section 174-A of IPC. The police registered the FIR No. 24 of 2022.
2. The petitioner filed the present petition for quashing the FIR. It was asserted that the petitioner never received any notice/summon from the Court of JMFC-III, Shimla. As per the order dated 29.8.2019, the notice was not received back. The bailable warrants were issued returnable for 19.4.2019. Non-bailable warrants of arrest were issued to secure the presence of the petitioner returnable for 18.2.2020. The bailable warrants were also not served upon the petitioner. The petitioner and the complainant have entered into a compromise. Therefore, it was prayed that the present petition be allowed and the FIR be quashed.
3. A st
Supriya Jain v. State of Haryana
Gulam Mustafa v. State of Karnataka
State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal
Abhishek v. State of M.P. 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1083
V. Ravi Kumar v. State represented by Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Salem, Tamil Nadu
Neeharika Infrastructure (P). Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra, Criminal Appeal No. 330 of 2021
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.