RAKESH KAINTHLA
Kailash – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RAKESH KAINTHLA, J.
1. The petitioner has filed the present petition for seeking regular bail. It has been asserted that the petitioner was arrested by the police for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 302, 307, 451, 323, and 324 read with Section 34 of IPC registered vide F.I.R. No. 51 of 2022, dated 04.06.2022 at Police Kot Kehloor, District Bilaspur, H.P. The informant Giano Devi has a long-standing dispute with the petitioner and his family members. The petitioner and his family members were arrested by the police on 04.06.2022. The mother of the petitioner lodged an F.I.R. No. 50 of 2022 against Smt. Giano Devi, Satish Kumar and Deshraj stating therein that Giano Devi started uprooting the wooden pillars on 04.06.2022 at 7:30 p.m. When the petitioner’s mother asked her not to do so; she and her family members attacked her with hockey sticks, axes and sticks. The police filed a cancellation report without conducting a proper investigation. The statements of spot witnesses Mintu and Kamla were not recorded. As per the cancellation report, Kunti Devi and the petitioner had sustained grievous injuries. However, no explanation for the same was provided in
Bishna alias Bhiswadeb Mahato and Others vs. State of West Bengal
Ch. Pulla Reddy and Others vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Jasdeep Singh vs. State of Punjab
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar vs. Rajesh Ranjan
Manik Das and Others vs. State of Assam
Prasanta Kumar Sarkar vs. Ashis Chatterjee
Ram Tahal and Others vs. State of U.P. AIR 1972 SC 254
Rajesh Govind Jagesha vs. State of Maharashtra
Ram Govind Upadhyay vs. Sudarshan Singh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.