VIRENDER SINGH
Hari Dass – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Virender Singh, J.
Petitioners have filed the present revision petition, against the judgment of conviction, dated 01.09.2015 and order of sentence dated 04.09.2015, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Shimla, District Shimla, H.P. (hereinafter referred to as the ‘First Appellate Court’), in Criminal Appeal No. RBT 218-S/10 of 14/11, titled as ‘State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Hari Dass and another’.
2. Vide judgment of conviction and order of sentence, as referred-to-above passed by the learned Appellate Court, the learned Appellate Court has allowed the appeal filed by the State, which has been preferred against the judgment of acquittal dated 14.01.2011, passed by the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.4, Shimla, District Shimla, H.P. (hereinafter referred to as the ‘learned trial Court’) in Police Challan RBT No. 49/2 of 06/04 titled as ‘State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Hari Dass and another’.
3. Vide judgment of conviction and order of sentence as referred-to-above, the learned Appellate Court has set aside the judgment of acquittal and convicted and sentenced petitioner Hari Dass for the offences punishable under Sections 170, 467, 468
The judgment emphasizes the importance of recording the complainant's statement and the sufficiency of evidence to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in criminal cases.
The main legal point established is the conclusive evidence of impersonation and possession of documents leading to the upheld conviction and sentence under Sections 120-B and 420 IPC.
The prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of the crime charged.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's reliance on witness testimonies, consideration of defense evidence, and rejection of the plea of false implication in upholding the con....
Failure of prosecution to prove charge beyond reasonable doubt due to inordinate delay in FIR and weak identification evidence.
Identification parade compromised by prior exposure to witnesses renders conviction invalid.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.