Raksha Devi vs State of H. P. - 2024 Supreme(HP) 321

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(HP) 321

RANJAN SHARMA
Raksha Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Parkash Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. Vishal Panwar, Mr. Chitranjan Kumar Sharma, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Ranjan Sharma, J.

Notice. Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr. Chitranjan Kumar Sharma, Advocate, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3 and respondent No.4, respectively.

2. With the consent of the parties, the instant writ petition is taken up for disposal, at this stage, in view of the order(s) intended to be passed hereinafter.

3. The petitioner a Class-IV employee in the Higher Education Department, has filed the instant writ petition, seeking the following reliefs:-

i) That the respondents may kindly be directed to count service as qualifying service of petitioner towards pension with effect from 26.5.2006 whereby granted whole time status followed by regularization without interruption and consequently she may be held entitled to pensionary benefits under CCS(Pension) Rules, 1972, with all consequential benefits;

(ii) That the respondents may kindly be directed to

extend the benefit of Apex Court judgment in Balo Devi vs. State of HP, reported in Latest HLJ 2022 (Vol-II) (HP) 817 and judgment dated 22.2.2022 in CWP No.2711/2021 titled as Baldev Singh Vs. State of H.P. Consequently the petitioner may be held entitl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document