Back
RANJAN SHARMA
Thandi Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ranjan Sharma, J.
Notice. Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. The petitioner has filed the instant petition for the following relief:
3. Case of the petitioner, in brief, is that the petitioner was engaged a Part-Time Water Carrier in the Department of Education, in March, 1997 and was regularized in September, 2007 and he retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation of 58 years on 31.08.2015.
4. The learned counsel submits that the issue as to whether the petitioner, who was engaged on Part-Time/Daily Wage basis w.e.f. 01.01.1994 i.e. prior to 10.05.2001 and was regularized on or after 10.05.2001 is entitled to continue in service upto the age of 60 years, as per the Office Memorandum dated 11.05.2001, the amendment dated 28.12.2019 and the amendment dated 21/22-02-2018 Fundamental Rule 56(e) stands adjudicated by the Full Bench of th
The date of engagement and regularization determines the entitlement to continue in service beyond the age of 58, as per the Office Memorandum and subsequent amendments.
The date of engagement is the decisive factor for determining the age of continuing in service, as per the interpretation of Fundamental Rule 56(e) discussed in the Full Bench judgment in the case of....
The date of engagement is the decisive factor for determining the retirement age of a daily wage worker, and similarly situated employees should not face discrimination.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of Class-IV employees engaged prior to 10.05.2001 to retire at the age of 60 years and the emphasis on notional fixation of pay for....
The date of engagement is the decisive factor for determining the retirement age of a Forest Worker, and non-discrimination amongst similarly situated employees is crucial in such cases.
Class IV servants engaged part-time/daily wages prior to 10.05.2001 and regularized after retire at 60 years based on engagement date; retrospective notional benefits for pension to those retired ear....
The date of engagement is the decisive factor for retirement age, and notional fixation of pay is important for pension calculation.
Point of Law : Since these employees have not actually worked beyond the age of 58 years, therefore, they will not be entitled to the actual monetary benefits of wages/salary etc. for the period of s....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the eligibility and entitlement to pension under the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, based on the petitioner's service history, including regular and de....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
