IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
VIRENDER SINGH, J.
Rakesh Kumar - Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh - Respondent
Cr.MP (M) No.732 of 2025
Decided on : 05-05-2025
(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 483 - Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act - Section 21 - Bail application - Applicant arrested for possession of contraband, specifically 1320 tablets of Diphenoxylate Hydrochloride & Atropine Sulphate, classified as commercial quantity - Investigation complete, charge-sheet filed - Court found no grounds for bail as applicant failed to prove innocence and risk of re-offending was present. (Paras 1 , 12 , 15 )
(B) Bail - Considerations for granting bail - The court emphasized that when the contraband is classified as commercial quantity, the stringent provisions of the NDPS Act apply, necessitating a higher threshold for bail. (Paras 14 , 15 )
Facts of the case:
The applicant was arrested on 25.04.2024 for possessing 1320 tablets of a controlled substance, which he claimed were innocently in his possession. The police report indicated the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed.
Findings of Court:
The court found that the contraband quantity fell under the definition of commercial quantity, invoking the stringent provisions of the NDPS Act, and determined that the applicant posed a risk of re-offending.
Issues: The main issues included whether the applicant had established grounds for bail and the implications of the contraband being classified as commercial quantity.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the classification of the contraband as commercial quantity invoked the strict provisions of the NDPS Act, which necessitated a denial of bail given the circumstances of the case.
Result: Bail application dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Virender Singh, J.
Applicant-Rakesh Kumar, has filed the present application, under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as the ' BNSS '), with a prayer to release him on bail, during the pendnecy of trial, arising out of FIR No.105 of 2024, dated 25.04.2024, registered under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘NDPS Act’), with Police Station Nalagarh, District Solan, H.P.
2. According to the applicant, he has been named as accused and arrested by the Police in the said case on 25.04.2024.
3. As per the applicant, he has no connection with the contraband shown to be recovered by the Police, in this case.
4. The applicant has termed the FIR registered against him, as false, registered, on the basis of concocted facts, by asserting the fact that he is an innocent person.
5. It is the further case of the applicant that investigation, in the present case, is complete, as the Police has filed the charge-sheet against him, which is pending in the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Solan. Hence, his custodial interrogation is no longer required.
6. Apart from this, the applicant, has given certain undertakings, for which, he is ready to abide by, in case, ordered to be released, on bail, during the pendency of the trial.
7. On the basis of the above facts, a prayer has been made to allow the application.
8. When put to notice, the police has filed the status report disclosing therein, that on 25.4.2024 HC Rakesh Kumar No.42, I.O., along with other police officials, had left Police Post Dabhota, for patrolling duty towards Bhatiyan, Jhiriwala side.
8.1. At about 6.30 p.m., the I.O, along with other police officials, was present on the link road from Jhiriwala to Bhatiyan, then, the I.O, noticed a person coming on foot from Jhiriwala side and he was moving towards Bhatiyan side, having blue coloured carry bag in his hand. On seeing the Police vehicle on the spot, the said person, at once, turned towards Katcha path in the fields and had started to run away. His activities raised suspicion, as such, driver was directed to stop the vehicle and with the help of other police official, the said person was nabbed.
8.2. On inquiry, the said person has disclosed his name as Rakesh Kumar (applicant). Thereafter, a passer- by, who has disclosed his name as Balwinder Singh, was also apprised about the facts and was requested to associate the police party as independent witness. In the presence of said Balwinder Singh, when, the I.O. inquired from Rakesh Kumar (applicant) about the carry bag, he has disclosed that the said carry bag was containing medicines.
8.3. On checking the same, it was found containing another black coloured polythene envelope in it, which, on opening, was found to be containing 16 strips, having 60 tablets, in each strip and 9 small strips, having 40 tablets, in each strip, total 1320 tablets of Diphenoxylate Hydrochloride & Atropine Sulphate.
8.4. The applicant could not produce a valid document/licence to carry those 1320 lomotil tablets. As such, all the tablets were put into the same packet and were sealed with 3 seals of seal having impression ‘M’.
8.5. Consequently, the said contraband was taken into possession and rukka was sent to the Police Station for registration of the FIR. Accused was arrested.
8.6. Thereafter, proceedings, under Section 52A of the NDPS Act, were got conducted by producing the same before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalagarh and the contraband, so recovered, was sent to SFSL Junga, from where, the following report has been received, which has been reproduced, in the status report:-
"The exhibit stated to be tablets of Lomotil is a sample of Diphenoxylate Tablets"
9. Lastly, it has been mentioned, in the status report, that except the present case, no other case has been found to be registered against the applicant.
10. The investigation is stated to be complete, as the Police
The classification of contraband as commercial quantity under the NDPS Act necessitates a higher threshold for bail, impacting the applicant's eligibility for release.
Possession of contraband classified as 'commercial quantity' under the NDPS Act justifies denial of bail, invoking strict legal provisions.
The court ruled that the quantities of contraband did not meet the commercial threshold, allowing bail under the NDPS Act due to complete investigation and absence of further recovery.
The court ruled that possession of a non-commercial quantity of narcotics does not invoke the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, allowing for bail based on the presumption of innocence.
The court ruled that the contraband did not constitute 'commercial quantity', thus allowing bail under reasonable conditions despite the applicant's criminal history.
The court held that bail for offences involving commercial quantities of narcotics requires strict adherence to Section 37 of the NDPS Act, emphasizing the necessity of satisfying specific conditions....
The court ruled that the applicant is entitled to bail as the contraband does not meet the definition of 'commercial quantity', and pre-trial punishment is prohibited.
The court held that possession of contraband not classified as commercial quantity allows for bail, emphasizing the prohibition of pre-trial punishment.
Bail granted in NDPS case involving non-commercial quantity contraband: Section 37 rigors inapplicable; presumption of innocence persists despite prior pending cases; no purpose in indefinite custody....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.