SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 86

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Sushil Kukreja, J
Balbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ram Krishan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Servedaman Rathore
For the Respondent: Vipin Bhatia

JUDGMENT :

Sushil Kukreja, J.

1. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner-accused under Section 438 read with Section 442 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), against judgment dated 29.10.2024, passed by learned Sessions Judge, District Sirmaur, at Nahan, H.P. in Criminal Appeal No. 06-Cr.A/10 of 2024, whereby the judgment of conviction and order of sentence, dated 08.12.2023, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nahan, District Sirmaur, H.P., in CIS Case No. 131 of 2018, was modified and sentence of imprisonment was reduced from two years to six months and fine amount was reduced from Rs.1,50,000/- to Rs.1,05,000/-.

2. The brief facts, giving rise to the present petition, can succinctly be summarized as under:

(a) The accused-Balbir Singh took a friendly loan of Rs.80,000/- from the complainant-Ram Krishan and he agreed to repay the same within a period of six months, i.e., on or before 19.11.2017. On 20.05.2017 the accused, in order to liquidate his financial liability towards the complainant, issued two cheques of HDFC Bank, Nahan, bearing No. 000046 and 000047, dated 19.11.2017 of Rs. 40,000/- each, in favour of the complainant.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top