SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 328

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Sushil Kukreja, J
Balbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
Mohi Ram – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Ashok K. Tyagi, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Sushil Kukreja, J.

The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner-accused under Section 397 read with Section 401 of Cr.P.C . against judgment, dated 02.08.2023, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P., in Case No. 73 of 2022, whereby the judgment of conviction and order of sentence, dated 20.05.2022, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Shillai, District Sirmaur, H.P., in Criminal Complaint No. N.I. 122/3 of 20/17, was affirmed.

2. The brief facts, giving rise to the present petition, can succinctly be summarized as under:

2(a). The petitioner/accused and the respondent/complainant were acquainted with each other and the petitioner requested the complaint to lend him Rs.50,000/- and he assured to return the same on demand. Therefore, the complainant gave Rs.50,000/- to the petitioner and when the complainant requested him to return the amount, he issued a cheque, bearing No. 621163, dated 19.05.2017, amounting to Rs.50,000/- drawn upon State Bank of India, ADB Branch, Paonta Sahib, to the complainant. However, the aforesaid cheque on being presented by the complainant for encashment, was returned by the Bank on 18

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top