Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Mr. Justice Virender Singh, J
Nishant Dhiman – Appellant
Versus
State of H.P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Virender Singh, J.)
Cr.MP No.1304 of 2025
By way of the present application, a prayer has been made to implead Manisha Sharma, as respondent No.3, who had sustained injuries in the accident in question.
2. State has filed the status report. Perusal of the status report would show that one Manisha Sharma had also sustained injuries in the accident, and for adjudication of the case, she is also necessary party. As such, she is required to be impleaded as party respondent, by exercising the powers under Section 528 of BNSS , 2023. Hence, said Manisha Sharma, is ordered to be impleaded as respondent No.3, in this case.
3. Application stands disposed of.
4. Amended memo of parties annexed with the application, be taken on record.
Cr.MMO No.207 of 2025
5. Respondent No.3 is present alongwith her counsel Mr. Dikken Kumar Verma, Advocate. Let her statement be recorded.
6. The petitioner has filed the present petition, under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (hereinafter referred to as ‘the B.N.S.S.’) for quashing of FIR No.47 of 2023, dated 09.03.2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the FIR in question’), registered under Sections 279 , 337 and 338 of the Indian Penal C
Compromise between parties in a criminal case can lead to quashing of FIR and proceedings if it serves the interest of justice and maintains societal peace.
A compromise between parties in a criminal case can lead to quashing of FIR when there's no negligence and maintaining peace is prioritized.
A compromise between the parties in a criminal case can lead to quashing of FIR when the complainant exonerates the accused, indicating minimal chances of successful prosecution.
Compromise between parties in vehicular offences can lead to quashing of FIR when no negligence is established, promoting societal peace and judicial efficiency.
Compromise between parties in a criminal case can lead to quashing of FIR and proceedings to prevent abuse of legal process.
The court held that a genuine compromise between the parties, supported by witness testimonies, can justify quashing an FIR and related proceedings.
A compromise between the parties can lead to quashing of FIR when the complainant exonerates the accused, indicating weak prosecution chances.
A valid compromise between parties can lead to quashing of FIR in criminal cases, especially when key witnesses exonerate the accused.
The court quashed the FIR based on a compromise where the complainant exonerated the petitioner, emphasizing the importance of maintaining societal harmony.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
