SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 297

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA 
RAKESH KAINTHLA
Mukul Chauhan - Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh - Respondent
Cr. MP (M) Nos. 879, 898, 903, 906 of 2025
Decided On : 15-05-2025


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Ajay Kochhar, Anubhav Chopra, Aanksha Chauhan, Swati Sharma, Ravi Tanta, Narender Singh Thakur
For the Respondents: Anup Rattan, Lokender Kutlehria, Prashant Sen, Dharam Singh, Hari Singh

Insufficient evidence to connect petitioners to drug trafficking; financial transactions and co-accused statements inadmissible as evidence.

Headnote:

(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 21, 27A, and 29 - Bharatiya Nayaya Sanhita, 2023 - Section 111(2) - Bail application - Petitioners sought bail in connection with FIR No. 107 of 2024 for drug-related offences - No recovery made from petitioners; investigation complete - Court found insufficient evidence to connect petitioners to drug trafficking or organized crime syndicate - Detention not justified. (Paras 2, 44)

(B) Bail - Parameters for granting bail - The court must consider the nature of accusations, gravity of the offence, and likelihood of tampering with evidence - Statements made by co-accused are inadmissible as evidence against others. (Paras 10, 14)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners were arrested based on disclosures by co-accused and financial transactions linked to a drug syndicate, but no drugs were recovered from them. The quantity of heroin involved was classified as intermediate. (Paras 2, 3)

Findings of Court:
The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against the petitioners under the NDPS Act and BNS, as the evidence relied upon was insufficient. (Paras 44)

Issues: The main issues included the admissibility of co-accused statements and the sufficiency of evidence to connect the petitioners to drug trafficking. (Paras 10, 44)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that financial transactions alone do not establish involvement in drug trafficking, and co-accused statements cannot be used as evidence against others. (Paras 14, 44)

Result: Petitions allowed; petitioners granted bail with conditions. (Paras 45)

JUDGMENT :

Rakesh Kainthla, J.

1. All the petitions have been filed for seeking regular bail in the same FIR; hence, these are being taken up together for disposal by way of a common judgment.

2. The petitioners have filed the present petitions seeking regular bail in FIR No. 107 of 2024, dated 14.8.2024, registered for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 21, 27A and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act and Section 111(2) of Bharatiya NayayaSanhita, (BNS), at Police Station, Sadar, Shimla, H.P. It has been asserted that the petitioners have been arrested based on the disclosure statements made by the co-accused, financial transaction with Sandeep Shah and call detail records. No recovery was made from the petitioners. The quantity of heroin stated to have been recovered in the present case is 6.038 grams, which is an intermediate quantity, and the rigours of Section 37 of the ND&PS Act do not apply to the present case. The petitioners are in custody, and no recovery is to be effected from them. The investigation is complete, and no fruitful purpose would be served by detaining the petitioners in custody. The petitioners would abide by the terms and conditions which the Court may impose. Hence, the petitions.

3. The petitions are opposed by filing status reports asserting that the police party was on patrolling duty on 13th August 2024. A secret information was received on 14th August 2024 at about 12:05 am that two persons staying in Room No. 101 of Hotel Himachal had a huge quantity of narcotics. The police reduced the information to writing and sent it to the Supervisory Officer. The police went to room number 101 with two independent persons. Suraj and Rohit Pandey were found in the room. The police searched the room and recovered one polythene packet containing 6.380 grams of heroin and a digital weighing machine. The police seized the heroin and the Digital weighing machine. The police arrested the occupants of the room. Suraj and Rohit Pandey disclosed during the investigation that the heroin was made available to them by Sandeep Shah. Sandeep Shah used to send the location and direct them to keep the heroin in those locations. They would drop the heroin and send the location to Sandeep Shah via WhatsApp. The police checked the call detail records and the bank account statements. The police found that Jitender Verma, Jugal Kishore and Aastik Chauhan were in contact with Rohit Pandey and Suraj. They had transferred a huge amount to Sandeep Shah’s bank account. Police arrested Jitender Verma, Jugal Kishore, Aastik Chauhan, Sandeep Shah and Neeraj Kashyap. The police found during the investigation that Sandeep Shah was dealing in narcotics. FIR number 108/2022 and FIR number 190/21 were registered against him. Many persons, including the present petitioners, had transferred the money to the accounts of Sandeep Shah, Arpita Shah, and Neeraj Kashyap. The petitioners are members of an organised crime syndicate which is involved in drug trafficking.Bandita Bali, wife of the petitioner, Mukul Chauhan, had transferred Rs.28,500/- to the account of Sandeep Shah. Neelam Chauhan, mother of the petitioner Mukul Chauhan, had transferred Rs.3,000/- to the account of Sandeep Shah and Rs.6,000/- to the account of Neeraj Kashyap. Petitioner Rajat Kreik had transferred Rs.55,000/- to Kotak Mahindra Bank account of Sandeep Shah, Rs.19,000/- to Utkarsh Small Finance Bank of Sandeep Shah, Rs. 12,000/- to the Union Bank Account of Neeraj Kashyap, Rs.14,000/- to SBI Account of Neeraj Kashyap and Rs.9,000/- to Ajay Goswami. Petitioner Sandeep Dhiman had transferred Rs.41,200/- to the account of Sandeep Shah. Petitioner-Akshit Verma had transferred Rs. 4,950/- to the account of Neeraj Kashyap, and his friend Sakshi had transferred Rs.63,600/- to the Kotak Mahindra Bank account of Sandeep Shah, Rs.10,600/- to the Union Bank of India account of Neeraj Kashyap and Rs.17,000/- to the account of Neeraj Kashyap i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top