IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTSNA REWAL DUA
Kali Dass – Appellant
Versus
State of H.P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J.
This writ petition has been filed for grant of following reliefs: -
1. That the petitioner be considered for pensionary benefits and payment thereof with effect from the date of his retirement under the old pension scheme.
2. That the respondents may very kindly be directed to grant the pension to the petitioner after counting the daily wage service for the purpose of completion of requisite years period for pension keeping in view of judgments dated 8.3.2018 passed in Civil Appeal No. 6309 of 2017 Sunder Singh Vs. The State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. and Civil Appeal No. 4792 of 2022 Balo Devi Vs, State of H.P & Ors., passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court.
3. That due and admissible arrears be also paid to the petitioner alongwith interest and other consequential benefits.”
2. Petitioner was initially engaged in the respondent- H.P. Public Works Department as Daily Wage Beldar in February 2002. Treating his daily wage service in each calendar year w.e.f. 2008 as 240 days and more, the respondents regularized petitioner’s services on 18.08.2015. Petitioner took up the matter before the learned Labour Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal, Dharamshala, District Kangra,
Daily wage service must be counted towards pension eligibility, allowing employees to qualify for benefits despite insufficient regular service years.
Daily wage service cannot be counted towards pension eligibility without a specific legal basis, as established in the Sunder Singh ruling, which is not applicable in this case.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the eligibility and entitlement to pension under the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, based on the petitioner's service history, including regular and de....
Service rendered by Class-III employees on a daily wage basis must be counted towards pension eligibility, as established by Supreme Court rulings.
Under Rule 13 thereof, the service that qualifies for pension commences from the date the employee takes charge of the post to which he is appointed either substantively or in an officiating/temporar....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement to pension for employees with more than 10 years of total eligible service, including daily wage service, and the incorrect rest....
Entitlement to family pension based on the requirement of regular service and the application of proportional equality in granting pension benefits.
The court ruled that procedural rigidity should not deny pension benefits to employees, especially when eligibility is undisputed, emphasizing fair treatment for lower-grade employees.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.