Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Mr. Justice Virender Singh, J
Swami Ramarupananda – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judicial custody not required (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. willingness to abide by conditions (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. interim bail granted (Para 9) |
| 4. police status report (Para 10) |
| 5. religious sacrilege (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. presumption of innocence (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 21) |
| 7. bail applications allowed (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
JUDGMENT :
1. The above-titled bail applications are being disposed of by the common order, as, all the ten bail applications have been filed, in the same FIR, i.e. FIR No. 205 of 2024, dated 17th November, 2024, registered under Sections 132, 121 and 221 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (hereinafter referred to as ‘BNS’), with Police Station West, Shimla, District Shimla, H.P.
3. According to the applicants, they are innocent persons and have falsely been implicated, in this case, by the police. They have termed the case of the police, as false and frivolous.
5. The applicants have also given the history of the incident, on the basis of which, the instant FIR has been registered against them.
7. As per the applicants, they are ready to abide by any condition(s), to be imposed by this Court, in case, any direction is issued to the police/Investigating Officer, un
The presumption of innocence prevails until trial conclusion, and vague police assertions are insufficient to deny bail.
The presumption of innocence prevails in bail applications, and vague police assertions are insufficient to deny bail; reasonable conditions may be imposed to address concerns.
Bail applications cannot be denied as a form of punishment; applicants are presumed innocent until proven guilty, and reasonable conditions can be imposed to ensure investigation integrity.
The presumption of innocence must be upheld in bail applications, and vague police assertions are insufficient to deny bail.
Bail can be granted when applicants are presumed innocent, no other cases exist against them, and pre-trial punishment is prohibited.
Pre-trial detention should not serve as punishment; applicants are presumed innocent until proven guilty, warranting their release on bail with conditions.
Bail cannot be denied as a form of punishment; applicants must cooperate with the investigation and comply with specified conditions.
Bail can be granted during trial if applicants are presumed innocent, no other cases exist against them, and pre-trial punishment is prohibited.
The court granted bail to the applicants, emphasizing that continued custody was unnecessary due to completed investigation and similar treatment of co-accused.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
