SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 1017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA 
VIRENDER SINGH, J.
Partap Singh - Appellant 
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
CrMPs(M) No. : 2911 and 2912 of 2024
Decided on : 02-01-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Applicant :Mr. Yashveer Singh Rathore, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Tejasvi Sharma, Additional Advocate General, with Mr. Rohit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, assisted by ASI Achhar Singh (IO), PS Bhuntar, District Kullu, H.P.

Pre-trial detention should not serve as punishment; applicants are presumed innocent until proven guilty, warranting their release on bail with conditions.

Headnote:(A) Code of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 483 - Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Section 3 - Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 32 & 33 - Mines & Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Section 21 - Indian Penal Code - Sections 286, 379 - Bail application - Applicants charged under multiple statutes for alleged illegal mining and use of explosives - Arrested and in judicial custody since 11.11.2024; claims of innocence presented by applicants. (Paras 1, 2, 23)

(B) Judicial Process - No punishment before trial - The court reaffirms that pre-trial detention should not be punitive, emphasizing that applicants should be presumed innocent until proven otherwise. (Paras 19, 20)

(C) Conditions for Bail - Stipulations include cooperation with the trial and non-tampering with evidence. (Paras 25)

Facts of the case:
The applicants were sought for releasing on bail while being in judicial custody for over a month, as they were accused of illegal mining activities in violation of multiple laws, including using explosives. (Paras 1, 2)

Findings of Court:
The court determined that there are no grounds justifying continued detention and the applicants should be granted bail under stipulated conditions. (Para 23)

Issues: The main issues revolved around the applicants' contribution to the alleged crime, their innocence claim, and the justification for granting bail despite the charges. (Paras 18, 24)

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the allegations alone do not merit prolonged detention, especially given the absence of other cases against the applicants and lack of perceived flight risk. (Paras 20-21)

Result: Bail applications allowed; applicants released on bail with conditions.

Table of Content
1. basis for bail application under bnss. (Para 1 , 2)
2. bail applications filed under bnss. (Para 3 , 4)
3. details of alleged criminal activities. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 10)
4. status of ongoing police investigation. (Para 14 , 15)
5. legal principles concerning presumption of innocence. (Para 18 , 19)
6. conditions for granting bail considered. (Para 20 , 21 , 22)
7. court's decision to grant bail based on the case. (Para 23)
8. conditions for bail granted. (Para 24 , 25)
9. court's clarifications on the observations made. (Para 26 , 27)
10. procedural directives post-bail grant. (Para 28 , 29 , 30)

JUDGMENT :

Virender Singh, J.

This order of mine shall dispose of both these applications, which have been filed by the applicants,under Section 483 of the Code of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘ BNSS ’), for releasing them, on bail, during the pendency of trial, in case FIR No.13 of 2024, dated 12.01.2024 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘FIR, in question’), registered with Police Station Bhuntar, District Kullu, H.P., under Section 3 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act of 1908’), Sections 3 2 & 33 of the Indian FOREST ACT , 1927 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act of 1927’), Section 21 of the Mines & Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act of 1957’) and Sections 3 79 and 286 of INDIAN PENAL CODE (hereinafter referred to as ‘the IPC).

2. The relief of bail has been sought on the ground that the applicants, in this case, have been arrested on 11.11.2024 and from that day, they are in judicial custody. The story of the police is stated to be imaginary and baseless, as, there is no link of the applicants in the commission of the alleged crime.

3. According to the applicants, they had earlier tried their luck by moving similar applications, before the Court of learned Special Judge, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P.However, the same were dismissed, vide order dated28.11.2024.

4. Apart from this, Mr. Yashveer Rathore, Advocate, appearing for the applicants, has given certain undertakings, on behalf of the applicants, for which, the applicants are ready to abide by, in case, ordered to be released on bail, during the pendency of the trial.

5. On the basis of the above facts, a prayer has been made to allow the application.

6. When, put to notice, the police has filed the status report, disclosing therein, that on 12.01.2024, Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Deputy Ranger Thela, Forest Range Hurla, came to the police station and moved the complaint, mentioning therein that on 10.01.2024, he received an information that at a place, known as Gomukh, some anti social elements have conducted the blasts in the hill, in order to take out crystal stones and the crystal stones are being excavated, upon which, the complainant has taken action and constituted a range level team.

7. As per further version of the complainant, on 11.01.2024, along with the said team, the complainant started going towards the spot, known as Gomukh, and they reached there, at about 10:00 am. At the spot, they noticed that 20-25 small and big holes were made in the hills. The place, where the said holes were made, is very difficult to reach. Number of ropes were found there, with the help of which, those anti social elements used to climb over the hills for excavating the crystal stones. Due to the blast and excavating the hills, it not only causing damage to the environment, but, also damage is being caused to the flora and fauna of the area.

8. According to the said complaint, from the spot, 15 tents were found to be unauthorizedly set up at Thonarang and about 60 people were found, most of whom were local residents of Gadsa Valley and some were of Nepali origin. Some of the persons were nabbed, while working on the spot and other persons ran away taking advantage of the height of the hill. There is a tunnel on the Gomukh hill, through which, common people can go and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top