IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
VIRENDER SINGH, J.
Partap Singh - Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
CrMPs(M) No. : 2911 and 2912 of 2024
Decided on : 02-01-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. basis for bail application under bnss. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. bail applications filed under bnss. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. details of alleged criminal activities. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 10) |
| 4. status of ongoing police investigation. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 5. legal principles concerning presumption of innocence. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 6. conditions for granting bail considered. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. court's decision to grant bail based on the case. (Para 23) |
| 8. conditions for bail granted. (Para 24 , 25) |
| 9. court's clarifications on the observations made. (Para 26 , 27) |
| 10. procedural directives post-bail grant. (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
JUDGMENT :
Virender Singh, J.
This order of mine shall dispose of both these applications, which have been filed by the applicants,under Section 483 of the Code of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘ BNSS ’), for releasing them, on bail, during the pendency of trial, in case FIR No.13 of 2024, dated 12.01.2024 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘FIR, in question’), registered with Police Station Bhuntar, District Kullu, H.P., under Section 3 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act of 1908’), Sections 3 2 & 33 of the Indian FOREST ACT , 1927 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act of 1927’), Section 21 of the Mines & Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act of 1957’) and Sections 3 79 and 286 of INDIAN PENAL CODE (hereinafter referred to as ‘the IPC).
2. The relief of bail has been sought on the ground that the applicants, in this case, have been arrested on 11.11.2024 and from that day, they are in judicial custody. The story of the police is stated to be imaginary and baseless, as, there is no link of the applicants in the commission of the alleged crime.
3. According to the applicants, they had earlier tried their luck by moving similar applications, before the Court of learned Special Judge, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P.However, the same were dismissed, vide order dated28.11.2024.
4. Apart from this, Mr. Yashveer Rathore, Advocate, appearing for the applicants, has given certain undertakings, on behalf of the applicants, for which, the applicants are ready to abide by, in case, ordered to be released on bail, during the pendency of the trial.
5. On the basis of the above facts, a prayer has been made to allow the application.
6. When, put to notice, the police has filed the status report, disclosing therein, that on 12.01.2024, Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Deputy Ranger Thela, Forest Range Hurla, came to the police station and moved the complaint, mentioning therein that on 10.01.2024, he received an information that at a place, known as Gomukh, some anti social elements have conducted the blasts in the hill, in order to take out crystal stones and the crystal stones are being excavated, upon which, the complainant has taken action and constituted a range level team.
7. As per further version of the complainant, on 11.01.2024, along with the said team, the complainant started going towards the spot, known as Gomukh, and they reached there, at about 10:00 am. At the spot, they noticed that 20-25 small and big holes were made in the hills. The place, where the said holes were made, is very difficult to reach. Number of ropes were found there, with the help of which, those anti social elements used to climb over the hills for excavating the crystal stones. Due to the blast and excavating the hills, it not only causing damage to the environment, but, also damage is being caused to the flora and fauna of the area.
8. According to the said complaint, from the spot, 15 tents were found to be unauthorizedly set up at Thonarang and about 60 people were found, most of whom were local residents of Gadsa Valley and some were of Nepali origin. Some of the persons were nabbed, while working on the spot and other persons ran away taking advantage of the height of the hill. There is a tunnel on the Gomukh hill, through which, common people can go and
Pre-trial detention should not serve as punishment; applicants are presumed innocent until proven guilty, warranting their release on bail with conditions.
Bail can be granted during trial if applicants are presumed innocent, no other cases exist against them, and pre-trial punishment is prohibited.
Bail can be granted when applicants are presumed innocent, no other cases exist against them, and pre-trial punishment is prohibited.
Bail granted in mob violence and police assault case amid communal tensions on grounds of trial pendency, presumption of innocence, parity with co-accused, completed investigation, clean antecedents,....
Bail granted despite serious charges as ongoing investigation shows no strong evidence against applicant.
Bail granted when investigation complete, recovery effected, no further detention needed.
The presumption of innocence prevails until trial conclusion, and vague police assertions are insufficient to deny bail.
Judicial discretion allows bail when prosecution fails to establish the applicant’s connection to alleged offenses, considering the state of investigation and absence of criminal history.
The court determines eligibility for bail based on sufficient grounds for continued detention under explosive-related charges.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.