IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Mr. Justice Virender Singh, J
Shami Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Virender Singh, J.)
By way of the present application, filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘ BNSS ’), applicant-Shami Kumar has sought his release, on bail, during the pendency of the trial, in case FIR No.73 of 2023, dated 13.07.2023, registered under Sections 21 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘NDPS Act’), with Police Station East Shimla, District Shimla, H.P.
2. According to the applicant, he is innocent person and has falsely been implicated, in the present case, by the police, on the ground that the contraband, weighing 13.63 gms of chitta/heroin, was recovered from the vehicle, being driven by Kuldeep Kumar and it has allegedly been revealed by accused Kuldeep Kumar that he has purchased chitta from one Shami, R/o Panchkula (applicant).
3. It is the case of the applicant that the story of the prosecution is highly improbable and police has not considered the fact that the applicant is doing the business and also paying Income Tax Returns.
4. It is the further case of the applicant that he is having no other case, registered against him and the inv
The court ruled that the presumption of innocence applies and the absence of a commercial quantity of contraband allows for bail under the NDPS Act.
Pre-trial punishment is prohibited, and the presumption of innocence remains until proven guilty, allowing bail when investigation is complete and no prior cases exist.
The court established that pre-trial detention is prohibited as punishment, and bail should not be denied based on prior unconvicted allegations, especially when no commercial quantity of narcotics i....
The presumption of innocence applies in bail applications, and previous unconvicted offenses do not automatically justify denial of bail.
The court ruled that possession of a non-commercial quantity of narcotics does not invoke the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, allowing for bail based on the presumption of innocence.
The court emphasized the presumption of innocence and the prohibition of pre-trial punishment, allowing bail based on the completion of investigation and parity with co-accused.
The presumption of innocence remains until conviction, and bail may be granted based on parity with co-accused and absence of commercial quantity of contraband.
Pre-trial punishment is prohibited; bail granted based on insufficient evidence and prior acquittals.
The court held that possession of contraband not classified as commercial quantity allows for bail, emphasizing the prohibition of pre-trial punishment.
The court ruled that the applicant is entitled to bail as the contraband does not constitute commercial quantity, and pre-trial punishment is prohibited.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.