IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
VIRENDER SINGH, J.
Ranjan Sharma - Appellant
Versus
State of H.P. - Respondent
Cr.MP(M)No.746 of 2025
Decided on : 05-05-2025
(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 483 - Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 21 and 29 - Bail application filed by applicant claiming innocence and no recovery from him - Investigation complete with charge-sheet submitted - Previous bail applications dismissed - Co-accused released on bail - Court found no commercial quantity involved and applicant's custodial interrogation not required - Bail granted with conditions. (Paras 1 - 19 )
(B) Pre-trial detention - The court emphasized that pre-trial punishment is prohibited and bail cannot be denied as a punitive measure. (Paras 16 - 20 )
Facts of the case:
The applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No.47 of 2024 for alleged involvement in narcotics trade, with no recovery from him and investigation complete.
Findings of Court:
The court determined that the applicant's continued detention was unnecessary and granted bail, subject to conditions.
Issues: The main issues included the applicant's innocence, the completion of the investigation, and the conditions for bail.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the applicant's prior cases did not negate his presumption of innocence and that the absence of commercial quantity allowed for bail.
Result: Bail application allowed.
JUDGMENT :
Virender Singh, J.
Applicant-Ranjan Sharma has filed the present application, under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as the 'BNSS'), with a prayer to release him on bail, in case FIR No.47 of 2024, dated 13.09.2024, registered under Sections 21 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘NDPS Act’), with Police Station Kotkhai, District Shimla, H.P.
2. According to the applicant, he is innocent person and has falsely been implicated, in the present case.
3. According to the applicant, no recovery has been effected from him and the investigation, in the present case, is complete, as the police has submitted the charge-sheet against him, as well as, his co-accused, in the competent Court of law.
4. Applicant has also tried his luck, by moving similar Application, before the Court of learned Special Judge, Rohru, Camp at Theog, which was dismissed on 19.02.2025.
5. Apart from this, learned counsel appearing for the applicant, has given certain undertakings, on behalf of the applicant, for which, the applicant is ready to abide by, in case, ordered to be released, on bail, during the pendency of the trial.
6. The applicant has also sought the relief of bail on the ground of parity, as, his co-accused Mehak Negi, Simran Negi, Pramod Khimta, Sachin Chauhan, Vikas Dutta and Lokinder, have already been released on bail, by this Court, vide orders dated 9.12.2024 and 01.01.2025, passed in Cr.MP(M) Nos.2648, 2649, 2950, 2974, 2978, and 2981 of 2024.
7. On the basis of the above facts, a prayer has been made to allow the application.
8. When put to notice, the police has filed the status report disclosing therein, that on 13.09.2024, I.O./ASI Karan Negi, along with other Police officials, had left the Police Station, in the official vehicle, for patrolling duty in order to detect the crime relating to excise and narcotic drugs.
8.1. At about, 10.30 a.m., when, the police party was present at a place known as Kokunala, then, the I.O. has received a secret information regarding indulgence of Suman Shahi, who is residing in the First Floor of the Rajinder Negi building, Kotkhai in the sale of Chitta/ heroin. As per the information, in case, said rented accommodation is searched, then, large quantity of Chitta/ Heroin could be recovered.
8.2. The said information was found to be authentic and reliable. According to the I.O., in case, search warrants were obtained, in that eventuality, there were chances that the contraband could be removed therefrom. As such, the information under Section 42(2) ND & PS Act, was prepared and the same was sent to the SDPO, Theog.
8.3 Thereafter, the I.O., along with the police officials, proceeded towards the Rajinder Negi building, Kotkhai. The owner of the building, Rajinder Negi, and Ward Member, were teleologically requested to come near Punjab National Bank, Kotkhai. When, ASI, and the other police officials reached at PNB Bank, Kotkhai, then, Rajinder Negi and Mohit Nanda, Ward Member, met them and both were apprised about the secret information, which the I.O. had received.
8.4. At about 12.45 p.m., when, the I.O. reached at the rented accommodation of Suman Shahi, along with raiding party and independent witnesses, the room was found closed from inside. On knocking, the door was opened by one lady. Two other persons were also found present there.
8.5. On inquiry, the said lady has disclosed her name as Suman Shahi, wife of late Vishnu Shahi and the two other persons disclosed their names as Ranjan Sharma (applicant) and Kamal Acharya. Thereafter, they were apprised about the secret information received by the I.O., before searching the said room. In the presence of independent witnesses, the I.O., as well as, raiding party had given their personal search. Thereafter, the search of the room of Suman Shahi was conducted.
8.6. During search, one almirah was found in the corner of the room, in which, a ball shap
The court established that pre-trial detention is prohibited as punishment, and bail should not be denied based on prior unconvicted allegations, especially when no commercial quantity of narcotics i....
The court emphasized the presumption of innocence and the prohibition of pre-trial punishment, allowing bail based on the completion of investigation and parity with co-accused.
The court ruled that the applicant is entitled to bail as the contraband does not constitute commercial quantity, and pre-trial punishment is prohibited.
Pre-trial punishment is prohibited; bail granted based on insufficient evidence and prior acquittals.
Pre-trial punishment is prohibited, and the presumption of innocence remains until proven guilty, allowing bail when investigation is complete and no prior cases exist.
The presumption of innocence applies in bail applications, and previous unconvicted offenses do not automatically justify denial of bail.
The court ruled that the presumption of innocence applies and the absence of a commercial quantity of contraband allows for bail under the NDPS Act.
The presumption of innocence remains until conviction, and bail may be granted based on parity with co-accused and absence of commercial quantity of contraband.
The presumption of innocence remains intact despite multiple cases against the applicant, and bail is granted as the quantity of contraband does not constitute 'commercial quantity' under the NDPS Ac....
Bail should not be denied as punishment before trial; completion of investigation and absence of commercial quantity justify granting bail.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.