Sukhdev Singh Parmar vs Financial Commissioner (Appeals)

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(HP) 700

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL
Sukhdev Singh Parmar – Appellant
Versus
Financial Commissioner (Appeals) – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the petitioner:Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shekhar Badola, Advocate.
For the respondents:Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Addl. AG., Mr. Vikas Rathore, Advocate, Mr. Nitin Thakur and Rajat Awasthy, Advocates, Mr. Dushyant Dadwal, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

(Ajay Mohan Goel, J.)

By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following substantive reliefs:-

“(i) That the impugned order dated 25.03.2014 passed by the Learned Financial Commissioner (Appeal) Himachal Pradesh respondent No. 1 in Revision Petition No. 148/2010, whereby the order dated 09.04.2010 passed by the Divisional Commissioner Kangra at Dharamshala in Revision Petition No. 235/2009, order dated 22.12.2008 passed in Case No. 15/2007 by the Learned Sub-division Collector Palampur and order dated 21.03.2007 passed by the Learned AC First Grade Palampur passed in case No. 23/2007 at Annexure P-2 to Annexure P-5 respectively may kindly be quashed and set aside and the suit land may kindly be ordered to be repartitioned strictly in accordance with the mode of partition prepared, in the interest of justice.”

2. The petitioner herein is aggrieved by the orders that have been passed by the Quasi-Judicial Authorities against the final partition which was assailed by the petitioner.

3. Brief facts necessary for the adjudication of this writ petition are that an application was moved before Assistant Collector 1st Grade, Palampur, District Kangra, H.P. by o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document