SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 790

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA 
RANJAN SHARMA, J.
Dropta Devi - Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and Another - Respondents
CWP No. 2508 of 2025
Decided On : 21-02-2025


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : P.P. Chauhan
For the Respondent: Y.P.S. Dhaulta

The court upheld the employer's discretion in posting decisions, finding no malice or illegality in the posting order after promotion.

Headnote:

(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Writ of Certiorari and Mandamus - Petitioner challenged posting order after promotion, claiming it was vindictive and illegal - Court upheld posting order, finding no infirmity or malice in the decision - Petitioner had shown willingness to join the assigned post, undermining her claims of malice. (Paras 9, 10)

(B) Employment Law - Promotion and Posting - The authority to assign postings lies with the employer, and absence of statutory violation negates claims of unfair treatment. (Paras 9.1, 9.2)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, promoted as Senior Assistant, contested her posting to a distant location, alleging malice due to her legal actions. The court found her claims unsubstantiated and upheld the posting order.

Findings of Court:
The posting order was lawful and did not violate any rules, and the petitioner’s willingness to join undermined her claims of malice.

Issues: The main issues were whether the posting order was vindictive and if the petitioner was treated unfairly compared to others.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the employer has discretion in posting decisions, and the petitioner’s own communications indicated her willingness to comply, negating her claims of malice.

Result: Petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Ranjan Sharma, J.

1. Heard, Learned Counsel for petitioner and Learned State Counsel at length.

2. Petitioner-Dropta Devi, Senior Assistant, has come up, before this Court, seeking the following relief(s):-

“a) To issue a writ of certiorari or direction in nature thereof, quashing the impugned order dated 05.02.2025 being Annexure P-7 of the writ petition, as unconstitutional and illegal and contrary to the law;

b) To issue a writ of mandamus, appropriate writ, order or direction in nature thereof, directing the respondent department to permit the petitioner either to discharge her duties at present place of posting or transfer her to any place of convenience at par with other incumbents who have been adjusted vide Office Order dated 04.02.2025 (Annexure P-8) with all consequential benefits for all purposes and intents.”

FACTUAL MATRIX

2.1 Case, as set up, by Learned Counsel, is that the petitioner was engaged as a Beldar [Class-III, on daily wage basis] on 01.01.2002 but since appointment, she was made to perform duties of higher post of Clerk-cum-Typist [Class-III] by the State Authorities:

(i) Based on the work performed, the petitioner filed an Original Application No.3264 of 2003 before Himachal Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal seeking regularization as Clerk-cum-Typist [Class-III] and upon abolition of State Administrative Tribunal, the matter stood transferred to this Court, as CWP(T) No.9797 of 2008 and in terms of judgment dated 17.09.2012, [Annexure P-1], respondents were directed to regularize the petitioner as Clerk [Class-III] w.e.f. 01.01.2002 with all consequential benefits, with the rider that arrears were restricted for three years, prior to filing of writ petition.

(ii) The State Authorities assailed the judgment dated 17.09.2012 [Annexure P-1] in LPA No.4040 of 2013 and in terms of judgment dated 13.10.2022, [Annexure P-2] the appeal was dismissed and the Impugned judgment dated 17.09.2012 [Annexure P-1]was upheld.

(iii) The State Authorities assailed the judgment dated 13.10.2022 [Annexure P-1], in LPA No.4040 of 2013, before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, In re: State of Himachal Pradesh and another versus Dropta Devi, in SLP (C) No.21468 of 2023 and in terms of the orders dated 25.09.2023 [Annexure P-3], the SLP was dismissed.

3. After dismissal of SLP on 25.09.2023 [Annexure P-3], the petitioner filed a Contempt Petition (C) No.553 of 2024, before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India when, the respondents/alleged contemnors were issued notice for personal appearance as per orders dated 2.1.2025 for 3.2.2025. However, on appearance by respondents/alleged contemnors, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India passed an order dated 03.02.2025 [Annexure P-4, Colly], disposing of the contempt proceedings in view of compliance made whereby, as per the orders dated 22.1.2025 [Annexure P-5], petitioner was promoted as Senior Assistant w.e.f. 16.07.2014 with all consequential orders.

4. Perusal of the Orders dated 22.01.2025, [Annexure P-5] supra, indicates that though Respondent No.2-Engineer-in-Chief [HPPWD], promoted the petitioner as Senior Assistant w.e.f. 16.07.2014 with all consequential benefits yet, a stipulation was clearly reflected that the posting order/seniority of the official shall be issued separately, which is borne out from the orders dated 22.01.2025, which reads as under:-

[Annexure P-5]

Dated:22.01.2025

“Himachal Pradesh

Public Works Department

OFFICE ORDER

On the recommendation of Departmental Promotional Committee and in compliance to the Judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in SLP(C) No.21468 of 2023, Smt. Dropta Devi, Jr. Asstt., presently posted in HPPWD Divn. Theog is hereby promoted to the post of Senior Assistant in the pay scale of Rs.10300- 34800+4400 Grade Pay (Pre-Revised) on regular basis with effect from 16.07.2014 with all consequential benefits.

The posting order/seniority of the official shall be orders separately.

Sd/-

Engineer-in-Chief

HPPWD, Shimla-2.

(i)As a sequel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top