M. Shobha Rani vs Director of Industries - 2025 Supreme(Telangana) 1892

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 1892

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
PULLA KARTHIK
M. Shobha Rani – Appellant
Versus
Director of Industries – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : P.V. KRISHNAIAH
For the Respondent: GP FOR SERVICES III

ORDER :

1. This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following relief:

“…to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India declaring para 3 of the proceedings No.24/2020/62212/ 2926887/FD-16 dated 18.01.2025 is concerned i.e. posting the petitioner as Assistant Director of 3^rd respondent and consequential proceedings No.22-2025-Relieving Order/FD dated 26.03.2025 as arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory, mala-fide, unconstitutional violating Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and issue consequential direction directing the 1^st and 2^nd Respondents to forthwith post the petitioner in the office of the 1^st respondent, if necessary replacing anyone of the party respondents i.e. Respondent No.4, 5 and 6 or alternatively direct the 1^st and 2^nd respondent to forthwith consider and post the petitioner in the office of the 1^st rest respondent as Assistant Director of Industries in the vacancy which will be available from 01.05.2025 due to retirement of Sri. Kondoju Chandrasekhar who is going to retire on 30.04.2025 and pass…”

2. Heard Sri P.V. K

Click Here to Read the rest of this document