IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTSNA REWAL DUA
Chief General Manager H.P. Telecom Circle – Appellant
Versus
Kashmir Singh (Government Contractor) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J.
Background of the case A dispute arose between Sh. Kashmir Singh, a Government Contractor and the Telecom Department in relation to two works awarded to him in Division Mandi Himachal Pradesh. Sh. Kashmir Singh moved two Arbitration Case Nos. 37 & 38 of 2019 under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short ‘the Act’) for appointment of arbitrator. Considering total value of claim in both cases at around Rs. 11 lacs, a learned Advocate was appointed as arbitrator for deciding both the claims. The arbitrator entered into the references and passed separate awards in two cases on 11.11.2022 directing the Telecom Department topay Rs. 4,40,521/- alongwith interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the claim petition in one claim and Rs. 2,26,554/- in the other alongwith interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the claim petition. Respondents were also directed to refund the security amount within 30 days failing which interest @ 6% p.a. was chargeable. Sh. Kashmir Singh filed objections under Section 34 of the Act before the learned District Judge, Mandi. Learned District Judge considered the provisions of Section 2 (1)(e
Konkan Railway Corpn. Ltd. & others vs. Mehul Construction Co.
Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd. & another vs. Rani Construction Pvt. Ltd.
SBP & Co. vs. Patel Engineering Ltd. & another
Hindustan Construction Company Limited vs. NHPC Limited & another
The High Court's appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) does not grant it jurisdiction over objections to the arbitral award under Section 34; objections must be heard in the proper princip....
The designated seat of arbitration establishes exclusive jurisdiction for related applications, affirming that the Commercial Court in Ranchi has jurisdiction over Section 34 applications.
The High Court has the authority to extend the mandate of the Arbitrator if the arbitration proceeding could not be concluded within a reasonable time, as per Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conci....
(1) A defect of jurisdiction, whether it is pecuniary or territorial, or whether it is in respect of subject matter of action, strikes at very authority of Court to pass any decree, and such a defect....
Point of law: Where any disputes arise between parties in respect of or in connection with the agreement then parties shall first endeavour to conciliate the disputes failing which the same shall be ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.