Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRENDER SINGH
Keshav Deen – Appellant
Versus
H.P. Minorities Finance & Development Corporation – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Virender Singh, J.
Petitioner-Keshav Deen has filed the present revision petition against the judgment dated 16.08.2023, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Shimla, District Shimla, H.P. (hereinafter referred to as the ‘First Appellate Court’), in Criminal Appeal No.75-S/10 of 2022, titled as Keshav Deen versus Himachal Pradesh Minorities Finance & Development Corporation.
2. By way of judgment dated 16.08.2023, the learned First Appellate Court has dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner against the judgment of convictionand order of sentence dated 03.08.2022, passed by the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.3, Shimla, District Shimla, H.P., (hereinafter referred to as the ‘trial Court’), in Criminal Case RBT No.347-3 of 18/16, titled as Himachal Pradesh Minorities Finance &Development Corporation.
3. Vide judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 03.08.2022, learned trial Court has convicted the petitioner, for the offence, punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘NI Act’) and sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment, for a period of one year and to pay a compensati
The court allows compounding of an offence under Section 138 of the NI Act after the parties settle their dispute, provided the compounding fee is deposited as directed.
The court permitted the compounding of an offence under Section 138 of the NI Act after the parties settled their dispute, leading to the acquittal of the petitioner.
The court allowed the compounding of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after the parties settled the matter, emphasizing the importance of amicable resolution.
The court permitted the compounding of an offence under Section 138 of the NI Act after the parties settled the matter, leading to the acquittal of the petitioner.
The offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can be compounded if the parties reach an amicable settlement.
The offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can be compounded if the parties reach a mutual settlement, allowing for acquittal upon payment of a compounding fee.
Offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can be compounded if the parties reach a mutual settlement.
Parties can compound offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act if settled amicably, leading to acquittal upon compliance with the compounding fee.
The court allowed the compounding of the offence under Section 138 of the NI Act based on mutual settlement, leading to the acquittal of the petitioner.
The court permitted the compounding of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after the parties settled their dispute, allowing the petitioner to be acquitted.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
