IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRENDER SINGH
Sanjay Chauhan – Appellant
Versus
Anurag Chauhan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Virender Singh, J.
Petitioner-Sanjay Chauhan has filed the present revision petitions against the judgments dated 29.11.2023, passed by learned Sessions Judge, Shimla, H.P. (hereinafter referred to as the ‘First Appellate Court’), in Criminal Appeal Nos.176, 177, 183, 184 of 2023, titled as Sanjay Chauhan versus Anurag Chauhan.
2. By way of judgments dated 29.11.2023, the learned First Appellate Court has dismissed the appeals filed by the petitioner against the judgments of conviction dated 01.08.2023 and orders of sentence dated 21.08.2023, passed by the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shimla, District Shimla, H.P., (hereinafter referred to as the ‘trial Court’), in Complaint u/s 138 of NI Act Nos.1110, 1111, 1114 and 1115 of 2019, titled as Anurag Chauhan versus Sanjay Chauhan.
3. Vide judgments of conviction dated 01.08.2023 and orders of sentence dated 21.08.2023, learned trial Court has convicted the petitioner, in all the cases, for the offence, punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘NI Act’) and sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment, for a period of six months and to pay a fine of Rs.5,20,000
Parties can compound offences under Section 138 of the NI Act if the matter is settled amicably, leading to acquittal of the accused.
The court allowed the compounding of the offence under Section 138 of the NI Act based on mutual settlement, leading to the acquittal of the petitioner.
The court permitted the compounding of an offence under Section 138 of the NI Act after the parties settled their dispute, leading to the acquittal of the petitioner.
The court allows compounding of an offence under Section 138 of the NI Act after the parties settle their dispute, provided the compounding fee is deposited as directed.
The court allowed the compounding of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after the parties settled the matter, emphasizing the importance of amicable resolution.
The court permitted the compounding of an offence under Section 138 of the NI Act after the parties settled the matter, leading to the acquittal of the petitioner.
The court permitted the compounding of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after the parties settled their dispute, allowing the petitioner to be acquitted.
Offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can be compounded if the parties reach a mutual settlement.
The offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can be compounded if the parties reach an amicable settlement.
Parties can compound offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act if settled amicably, leading to acquittal upon compliance with the compounding fee.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.