SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 930

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA 
VIRENDER SINGH, J.
Vijay Bihari - Applicant
Versus
State of H.P. - Respondent
Cr. MP(M) No. 3008 of 2024
Decided On : 28-02-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Ms. Rameshwari Sharma.
For the Respondent: Mr. Mohinder Zharaick and Mr. H.S. Rawat, Addl. A.Gs with Ms. Rohit Sharma, Dy. A.G.

Non-disclosure of prior criminal activity and association with a drug trafficking gang warrant denial of bail despite claims of non-commercial drug quantity.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 483 - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 21 and 29 - Bail application - Applicant alleged to be kingpin of drug supply gang, denied bail despite claims of non-commercial quantity of contraband - Police report indicating multiple cases against applicant not disclosed in the application. (Paras 7, 11, 12, 17)

(B) Principle of non-bailability under NDPS Act - The applicant's claims of having no prior criminal record were countered by police demonstrating his involvement in drug trafficking and ongoing criminal activities, informing the court of the potential for witness tampering. (Paras 9.13, 16)

Facts of the case:
The applicant seeks bail while charged for possessing 179.98 grams of chitta/heroin with previous allegations of drug-related offenses under NDPS Act. The applicant claims false implication and insists the quantity is non-commercial.

Findings of Court:
The court found the applicant's bail application unsubstantiated given his prior criminal record and the serious nature of charges against him, concluding he poses a continued risk of re-offending.

Issues: Whether the applicant's involvement in previous drug offenses justifies the denial of bail despite claims of non-commercial drug quantity.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that previous criminal behaviors and the seriousness of the charges justified denying bail, emphasizing comprehensive disclosure of prior offenses in bail applications.

Result: Application dismissed.

Table of Content
1. applicant seeks bail on grounds of false implication and lack of prior offenses. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. police outlines details of the investigation and applicant's involvement in narcotics. (Para 9)
3. court details its reasoning against bail, citing applicant's previous cases and ongoing criminal activities. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. court concludes denial of bail based on the applicant's activities and risk of re-offending. (Para 17)
5. court clarifies observations made are limited to the bail application, not merit of the case. (Para 18)

JUDGMENT :

Virender Singh, J.

Applicant Vijay Bihari has filed the present application, under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the B.N.S.S.’) for releasing him, on bail, during the pendency of the trial, in case FIR No. 177 of 2023, dated 22.11.2023, under Sections 21 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the NDPS’) registered with Police Station, Theog, District Shimla, H.P.

2. According to the applicant, he has falsely been implicated in this case.

3. As per the applicant, the quantity of chitta/heroin, allegedly recovered from his possession, is 179.98 grams, whereas, the same has been found to be weighing 170.668 grams, in the laboratory.

4. It is the case of the applicant that he is a young man of 25 years and the sole bread earner of his family.

5. It is the further case of the applicant that he is having deep roots in the society, and except the present case, no other case has been registered against him.

6. According to the applicant, chances of conclusion of trial, against the applicant, in near future, are not so bright, as such, no useful purpose would be served by keeping him in judicial custody. The contraband, allegedly recovered, in this case, is also stated to be not falling within the definition of ‘commercial quantity’.

7. All these facts have been highlighted to show that rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act are not applicable, in the present case.

8. On the basis of above facts, Ms. Rameshwari Sharma, Advocate, appearing for the applicant, has given certain undertakings, for which, he is ready to abide by, in case, ordered to be released on bail.

9. When, put to notice, Police has filed the status report, disclosing therein that on 21.11.2023, ASI Narender Kumar, Incharge, Police Chowki, Fagu, received a secret information on his mobile phone, at about 11:45 p.m. As per the information, a vehicle bearing No.HR-04K-0225, being driven by its driver, was moving from Kufri side. There were stated to be three occupants in the said car, who were having large quantity of narcotic substance, in their possession. The said information was found to be authentic and reliable.

9.1 It is the further case of the Police that according to the I.O., the Court complex was at a considerable distance, as such, it was not possible for him to obtain search warrant, and in case, any efforts were made in this regard, in that eventuality, the contraband could have been removed from the vehicle, upon which, he has complied with the provisions of Section 42 (2) of the NDPS Act, and submitted the same to the SDPO Theog, through Constable Amit. Thereafter, I.O. alongwith other police officials had put picketing at main chowk, Fagu, at about 12:05 a.m.

9.2 In the meanwhile, vehicle No.HP-09C-4077, being driven by its driver, reached at the place of picketing. Apart from the driver, another person was also found sitting in the car. On inquiry, the driver of the vehicle disclosed his name as Parth, S/o Rajinder Singh, Vill Gallu, P.O. Phagu, Tehsil Theog, District Shimla, H.P., and the other person disclosed his name as Naresh Kumar. Both of them were apprised about the secret information and associated them in the raiding party, as independent witnesses.

9.3 At about 12:30 a.m., vehicle bearing No. HR-04K-0225, being driven by its driver, reached at the spot fr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top