SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 1030

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA 
VIRENDER SINGH, J.
Pramod Khimta - Appellant 
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh - Respondent 
Cr.MP (M) Nos.2950, 2974, 2978 & 2981 of 2024
Decided on : 01-01-2025

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Ajay Kochhar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Varun Chauhan, Mr. K.S. Dhaulta,   Mr.   Harish   Sharma,   Mr. Vipan   Rajta,   &   Mr.   Jagat   Paul, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Mr.   Mohinder   Zharaick,   Mr.   H.S. Rawat   and   Mr.   Tejasvi   Sharma, Additional   Advocate   General, assisted by ASI Karan Singh Police Station, Kotkhai, District Shimla.

Bail must not be denied as a punitive measure; presumption of innocence prevails and applicants are entitled to bail as per parity with co-accused.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 483 - Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 21 and 29 - Applications filed for bail on grounds of innocence and completion of investigation - Bail applications allowed with conditions for personal bonds; judicial custody deemed unwarranted given no evidence of commercial quantity - Permitted release due to parity with co-accused released on bail. (Paras 1, 18, 19)

(B) Constitutional Law - Presumption of innocence and no pre-trial punishment - The court emphasizes that bail cannot be denied as a punitive measure, and pre-trial punishment is prohibited by law. (Paras 16)

Facts of the case:
The applicants sought bail under the ground that they were falsely implicated, the investigation was complete, and they had made attempts for bail previously, which were denied. The police had charged them regarding possession and trading of a narcotic substance. (Paras 1, 3, 11)

Findings of Court:
In light of the lack of recovery and the completion of the investigation, the court found that continued custody was not justified. (Paras 14, 18)

Issues: The main issues were the justification for denying bail, the presumption of innocence, and the argument for parity with co-accused who were granted bail. (Paras 12, 16, 18)

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that since the contraband was not in commercial quantity and the investigation was completed, refusal of bail would violate principles against pre-trial punishment and guarantee of the presumption of innocence. (Paras 13, 16)

Result: Bail applications allowed and applicants directed to be released on conditions stipulated. (Paras 18)

Table of Content
1. bail applications filed under relevant sections. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments for bail based on innocence and completed investigation. (Para 4 , 5 , 10)
3. court's observations on investigation and potential for re-offending. (Para 6 , 8 , 9)
4. legal principles on presumption of innocence and pre-trial considerations. (Para 13 , 14 , 16)
5. final decision to grant bail with specific conditions. (Para 18 , 19 , 22 , 23)

JUDGMENT :

Virender Singh, J.

Applicants, have filed the above titled applications, under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as the ' BNSS '), with a prayer to release them on bail, in case FIR No.47 of 2024, dated 13.09.2024, registered under Sections 21 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘NDPS Act’), with Police Station Kotkhai, District Shimla, H.P.

2. According to the applicants, they are innocent persons and have falsely been implicated, in the present case.

3. According to the applicants, no recovery has been effected from them and the investigation, in the present case, is complete, as the police has submitted the charge-sheet against them, in the competent Court of law.

4. Applicants have also tried their luck, by moving similar Applications, before the Court of learned Special Judge, Rohru, Camp at Theog, which were dismissed on 2012.2024.

5. Apart from this, learned counsel appearing for the applicants, have given certain undertakings, on behalf of the applicants, for which, the applicants are ready to abide by, in case, ordered to be released, on bail, during the pendency of the trial.

6. The applicants have also sought the relief of bail on the ground of parity as their co-accused Mehak Negi and Simran Negi, have already been released on bail, by this Court, vide order dated 9.12.2024, passed in Cr.MP(M) Nos.2648 & 2649 of 2024.

7. On the basis of the above facts, a prayer has been made to allow the applications.

8. When put to notice, the police has filed the status report disclosing therein, that on 13.09.2024, I.O./ASI Karan Negi, along with other Police officials, had left the Police Station, in the official vehicle, for patrolling duty in order to detect the crime relating to excise and narcotic drugs.

8.1. At about, 10.30 a.m., when, the police party was present at a place known as Kokunala, then, the I.O. has received a secret information regarding indulgence of Suman Shahi, who is residing in the First Floor of the Rajinder Negi building, Kotkhai in the sale of Chitta/ heroin. As per the information, in case, said rented accommodation is searched, then, large quantity of Chitta/Heroin could be recovered.

8.2. The said information was found to be authentic and reliable. According to the I.O., in case, search warrants were obtained, in that eventuality, there were chances that the contraband could be removed therefrom. As such, the information under Section 42 (2) ND & PS Act, was prepared and the same was sent to the SDPO, Theog.

8.3 Thereafter, the I.O., along with the police officials, proceeded towards the Rajinder Negi building, Kotkhai. The owner of the building, Rajinder Negi, and Ward Member, were teleologically requested to come near Punjab National Bank, Kotkhai. When, ASI, and the other police officials reached at PNB Bank, Kotkhai, then, Rajinder Negi and Mohit Nanda, Ward Member, met them and both were apprised about the secret information, which the I.O. had received.

8.4. At about 12.45 p.m., when, the I.O. reached at the rented accommodation of Suman Shahi, along with raiding party and independent witnesses, the room was found closed from inside. On knocking, the door was opened by one lady. Two other persons were also found present there.

8.5. On inquiry, the said lady has disclosed her name as Suman Shahi, wife of late Vishnu Shahi and the two other persons disclosed their names as Ranjan Sharma and Kamal Acharya. Thereafter, they were apprised about the secret informat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top