SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 1011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Rakesh Kainthla
Surender – Appellant
Versus
Kusma – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Rakesh Kainthla, J.

The present revision is directed against the order dated11.12.2024 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Mandi, District Mandi (learned Trial Court), vide which the petition filed by the respondents (applicants before learned Trial Court) was allowed and the petitioner (respondent before learned Trial Court) was directed to pay monthly maintenance at the rate of Rs.2,500/- to present respondent No.1 and Rs.2,000/- each to the present respondents No. 2, 3 and 5 from the date of filing of the application. (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience).

2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present petition are that the applicants filed a petition under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before learned Judicial Magistrate First Class (Court No.4), Mandi, District Mandi, seeking maintenance from the respondent. This petition was allowed on 19.01.2016. Maintenance of Rs.1500/- per month was awarded to applicant No.1, maintenance of Rs.1000/- per month was awarded to applicant No.2 and maintenance of Rs.500/- per month each was awarded to applic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top