The conclusion of the case, based on the provided legal guidelines and judicial directions, is that the order for interim maintenance awarded to the respondent wife and minor son is affirmed and remains in force. The husband is directed to pay the entire arrears of maintenance within the stipulated period and continue to comply with the maintenance order during the pendency of the proceedings (!) (!) .

Furthermore, the proceedings for the substantive claim of maintenance under section 125 of the Cr.P.C. are to be finalized by the Family Court within a specified time frame, considering the guidelines issued to prevent delays and ensure prompt justice (!) .

The court emphasizes the importance of transparent disclosure of assets and liabilities, and the filing of standardized affidavits of disclosure by both parties to facilitate accurate assessment of the quantum of maintenance (!) (!) . It also underscores that maintenance awarded under different statutes can be cumulative but should be adjusted or set off to prevent double recovery, ensuring equitable obligations for the husband (!) (!) .

In conclusion, the case affirms the legal obligation of the husband to provide maintenance, directs the enforcement of the maintenance orders, and establishes procedural guidelines to streamline future maintenance proceedings, ensuring social justice and the protection of the rights of the dependent wife and children (!) (!) .