Back
THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
RAKESH KAINTHLA
Vikas Verma – Appellant
Versus
Ashutosh Soni – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the complaint and proceedings (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. trial court's findings and evidence presented (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. arguments presented by parties (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. legal standards for revisional jurisdiction (Para 14 , 15) |
| 5. requirement of issuing cheque by the accused (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. conclusion and order of acquittal (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
JUDGMENT :
Rakesh Kainthla, J.
The petitioner has filed the present petition against the judgment dated 21.05.2022, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Una, District Una, H.P. (learned First Appellate Court), vide which the appeal filed by the petitioner (appellant before the learned First Appellate Court) was dismissed and the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 30.11.2019, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, First Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes Class, Court No.II, Una, District Una (learned Trial Court) were upheld. (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience).
2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the prese
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
