Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
VIRENDER SINGH
Pushpinder Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Prem Chand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellate jurisdiction on prior judgments. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. plaintiffs claim ownership based on a will. (Para 4) |
| 3. defendants contest plaintiffs' standing and claims. (Para 7) |
| 4. court's assessment of will validity and evidentiary claims. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 34) |
| 5. appeal dismissed; judgments upheld. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
Virender Singh, J.
1. Unsuccessful plaintiffs have preferred the present Regular Second Appeal, under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree, dated 7.12.2005, passed by the Court of learned Additional District Judge-I, Kangra at Dharamshala (hereinafter referred to as ‘the First Appellate Court’), in Civil Appeal No. 90-D/03, titled as, ‘Pushpinder Kumar & others versus Prem Chand & others.’
2. Vide judgment and decree, dated 7.12.2005, the learned First Appellate Court has dismissed the appeal, preferred by the appellants/plaintiffs, against the judgment and decree, dated 28.5.2003 passed by the Court of learned Sub Judge, 1st Class (I), Dehra, District Kangra, H.P. (hereinafter referred to as ‘the learned trial Court’), in Civil Suit No. 112 of 1995, titled as, ‘Pushpinder Kumar & others versus
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
