SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RAKESH KAINTHLA
Sudesh Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Pawan Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Sanjay Jaswal, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Athrav Sharma, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Rakesh Kainthla, J.—The present appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 31.08.2022 passed by learned Additional District Judge-I, Kangra at Dharamshala (learned First Appellate Court), vide which the appeal filed by the appellant (plaintiff before learned Trial Court) was dismissed. (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience).

2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the plaintiff filed a civil suit before the learned Trial Court seeking a declaration that she has succeeded her mother Savitri Devi’s share in the suit land mentioned in the headnote of the plaint on the basis of Hindu Succession Act, entries regarding Savitri Devi’s estate in favour of the defendant based on the Will dated 7.10.2010 bearing registration No. 3313/2010 registered with Sub Registrar, Indora, stated to have been executed by Savitri Devi are null and void and do not affect the rights of the plaintiff to succeed to her estate. A relief of permanent prohibitory injunction for restraining the defendant from alienating the suit land, dispossessing the plaintiff from th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top