Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Satyen Vaidya
Chanchal Rana – Appellant
Versus
Vibha Tanu Shree Pathania – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. invocation of supervisory jurisdiction for maintenance order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. dispute over income and maintenance obligations. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. need for objective assessment in maintenance cases. (Para 6 , 9) |
| 4. establishing guidelines for affidavit of disclosure. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. setting aside prior order and mandating reconsideration. (Para 10 , 11) |
UDGMENT :
Satyen Vaidya, J.
1. The petitioner has invoked supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against order dated 02.08.2023 passed by learned Additional Principal Judge-II, Family Court, Una, District Una, H.P. in case No. 205/2023 whereby the application of respondent under Section 24 of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT has been granted.
2. Petitioner has filed a petition for dissolution of marriage by decree of divorce against respondent, which is pending adjudication before learned Additional Principal Judge-II, Family Court, Una. It is alleged by the petitioner that his marriage with respondent, that had taken place on 16.01.2020, could not be consummated and the respondent has been alleged to be responsible therefor. As averred in the petition for divorce, the petitioner had
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
