MAYANK KUMAR JAIN
Santosh Kumar Jaiswal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Arvind Prabodh Dubey, learned counsel for the applicant and Mohd. Naushad Ahmad Khan, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and AGA for the State.
2. Perused the record.
3. Present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the order dated 11.04.2023 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 60 of 2019 (Santosh Kumar Jaiswal Vs. State of U.P. and others) and order dated 03.09.2019 passed by Civil Judge (J.D.), Kushinagar in Case No. 236 of 2017 (Vineeta Jaiswal Vs. Santosh Kumar Jaiswal) under Section 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as ‘D.V. Act’ )
4. Opposite party no. 2, Vineeta Jaiswal moved an application before the learned trial Court under Section 12 of D.V. Act on the following grounds:-
4.1 That her marriage with the applicant was solemnized on 29.01.2007 according to the Hindu rituals. Her parents had given sufficient jewellery and articles in her marriage.
4.2 Her husband, Santosh Kumar Jaiswal, brother-in-law Krishna Jaiswal (Jeth), sister-in-law Poonam Jaiswal (Jethani) made a demand of Rs. 2,00,000/- in cash from her.
4.3 She informed his parents and her brother about this demand. They e
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.