SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(HP) 5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
VIVEK SINGH THAKUR, RANJAN SHARMA, JJ.
Balbir Singh & Ors. – Petitioners
Versus 
State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. – Respondents
CWP No.2992 of 2026
Decided On : 06-04-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Additional Advocate General.

Constitutional mandates for establishing municipalities under Article 243Q can be flexibly interpreted, allowing various factors for inclusion without strict adherence to all listed criteria.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 and Article 243Q - Petition challenging the constitution of Nagar Panchayat Barsar - Petitioners allege the notifications to be arbitrary and illegal, failing to meet the constitutional requirements for declaring a municipality - Inclusion of area lacking sufficient basis to be a transitional area as defined under Article 243Q. (Paras 1, 9-10)

(B) Legal Standards for Municipalities - The court emphasized the discretion afforded under Article 243Q(2) for determining a municipal area, stating that not all listed factors need to exist concurrently; considerations may vary. (Paras 11, 18)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners contest the inclusion of their Gram Panchayat in Nagar Panchayat Barsar based on flawed notifications that they argue lack legal and material support, further claiming financial burdens and loss of rural identity. Respondents asserted all necessary legal processes were followed. (Paras 1-2, 20)

Findings of Court:
The notifications for Nagar Panchayat constitution were upheld, finding no arbitrary or illegal process in their issuance or consideration of objections. The area satisfied the requirements outlined under Article 243Q. (Paras 18-20)

Issues: The legality of notifications for Nagar Panchayat creation in terms of compliance with constitutional mandates, and the adequacy of considerations undertaken by the respondents. (Paras 1, 10)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the notifications met constitutional requirements and upheld respondents' decisions, substantiating that sufficient material grounds were present for the municipal designation. (Paras 18-20)

Result: Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. petitioners challenge notifications for nagar panchayat barsar (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. respondents argue compliance with legal formalities (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 12 , 13 , 16)
3. details requirements for establishing municipal areas (Para 11)
4. court finds valid reasons for nagar panchayat creation (Para 14 , 15 , 18 , 19)
5. court dismisses petition; notifications upheld (Para 20)

JUDGMENT :

Vivek Singh Thakur, J.

By way of the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioners have assailed proposal for constitution and declaration of Nagar Panchayat Barsar, District Hamirpur, vide impugned notification dated 23/24.11.2025 (Annexure P-1), as well as final notification dated 25.02.2026 (Annexure P-6) creating Nagar Panchayat Barsar, issued by respondents, alleging the same to be arbitrary, illegal, and violative of Article 243Q of the Constitution of India. It is further submitted that the notification so published lacks the essential ingredients, required to be incorporated therein as envisaged under Article 243Q of the Constitution.

2. This is the second round of litigation. The respondents had notified proposal for declaration of Nagar Panchayat Barsar vide notification dated 23/24.11.2024 (Annexure P-1), inviting objections from affected persons through Deputy Commissioner, Hamirpur, within a period of two weeks.

3. Petitioner has filed objections against inclusion of area of Gram Panchayat Bani in proposed Nagar Panchayat, Barsar, on the ground that for inclusion of Wards of their Gram Panchayat in Nagar Panchayat Barsar, all villagers are annoyed, who are residents of rural area, and some of them are Below Poverty Line and all of them are engaged in animal husbandry and agricultural activities. It is further contended that Panchayat/Wards are situated at a distance of 3–5 kilometers from the town, and residents cannot bear the financial burden associated with Nagar Panchayat.

4. Vide notification dated 20.12.2024 (Annexure P-3), Department of Urban Development, Government of Himachal Pradesh, after receiving objections from inhabitants of the local areas, constituted Nagar Panchayat Barsar, District Hamirpur.

5. Aforesaid notification was assailed by the petitioners by filing CWP No.819 of 2025 (Balbir Singh & Ors. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.), which was decided on 18.12.2025 (Annexure P-4) by quashing and setting aside the notification dated 20.12.2024 (Annexure P-3), with directions to Secretary, Urban Development, to consider the objections of the petitioners and to take appropriate decision in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably on or before 10.01.2026, by passing a reasoned and speaking order after providing personal hearing to the petitioners.

6. In sequel to aforesaid order, objections filed by the petitioners were considered and decided by the Principal Secretary (Urban Development) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, vide office order dated 09.02.2026 (Annexure P-5) after giving personal hearing to the petitioners, whereby the objections filed by the petitioners have been rejected and vide fresh final notification dated 25.02.2026 Wards of Gram Panchayat, Bani, have again been notified to have been included in Nagar Panchayat Barsar.

7. In the aforesaid background, present petition has been filed assailing the draft notification dated 23/24.11.2025 (AnnexureP-1) as well as the final notification dated 25.02.2026 (Annexure P-6).

8. Respondents have defended the constitution of the Nagar Panchayat in reference, by submitting that the impugned notification was issued after fulfilling all legal formalities, by exercising the powers conferred upon them for better development and improved arrangements in the area in reference, after giving due consideration to the objections raised by local inhabitants and to fulfill the long-standing demand of large number of people of the area.

9. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top