SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(HP) 23

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
SUSHIL KUKREJA, J. 
Surinder Singh – Appellant
Versus 
Collector Land Acquisition & Another – Respondents
RFA No. 3 of 2012 with RFAs No. 622, 623 & 624 of 2011 with Cross Objections No. 1000 to 1003 of 2012
Decided On : 06-04-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :Mr. V.S. Chauhan, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Bhavani Negi, Advocate and Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Aditya Chouhan and Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocates.
For the Respondent/State:Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj Negi, Additional Advocates Genera with Mr. Ankush Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy Advocates General.
For the Cross-objectors :Mr. Bhupinder Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajeet Singh Pal, Advocate.

The court ruled that proper market value determination for acquired land must prioritize the highest bona fide transaction and that interest is owed from the date possession is taken, not from the date of the award.

Headnote:(A) Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 23 and 34 - Appeals and cross objections against award for land acquisition - The petitioners sought enhancement of compensation from Rs.12,741/- to Rs.35,000/- per biswa, with the court deeming Rs.24,000/- per biswa appropriate after considering factors like potential value and previous sale transactions - Solatium and additional compensation were also awarded under respective provisions. (Paras 1-32)

(B) Market Value - The market value assessment should prioritize the highest bona fide transactions rather than averaging disparate sale transactions - Deductions for development should be considered contextually based on land classification and potential. (Paras 10-11, 17-22)

(C) Interest - The court clarified interest payable on compensation should commence from the date of possession, not the award date, aligning with Section 34 of the Act. (Paras 27-30)

Facts of the case:
The appeals arose from a land acquisition compensation case involving 37-16-01 acres in Mandi, where the previous assessment was contested by the landowners, leading to a reference for enhancement.

Findings of Court:
Enhanced compensation set at Rs.24,000/- per biswa with applicable solatium and additional compensation calculated appropriately.

Issues: Whether market value had been accurately assessed and if the interest was rightly computed.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the true market value reflects genuine willing buyer/seller transactions, and interest must align with statutory provisions.

Result: Appeals allowed and enhanced compensation awarded.

Table of Content
1. overview of case and compensation awarded. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments against the valuation and interest payment. (Para 7 , 8)
3. analysis of market value determination principles. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. rules on averaging and high-value sales in compensation. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 24)
5. summary of interest calculation according to act. (Para 27 , 30)
6. final judgment and compensation modifications. (Para 31 , 32)

JUDGMENT :

Sushil Kukreja, J.

Since all these appeals and cross objections are the offshoots of award, dated 16.08.2011, passed by learned Additional District Judge, Mandi, H.P. (hereinafter referred to as “the learned Reference Court”), the same are taken up together and being disposed of by a common judgment.

2. The instant appeals have been preferred by the appellants, who were petitioners/claimants before the learned Reference Court, under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure read with Section 54 of the LAND ACQUISITION ACT (for short “the Act”) against award dated 16.08.2011, passed by learned Reference Court, with a prayer that the appeals be allowed by setting-aside the impugned award, passed in their petitions and the market value of their acquired land be assessed and declared as not less than Rs.35,000/- per biswa, irrespective of the classification. On the other hand, Himachal Pradesh Housing and Urban Development Authority (respondent No. 2 before the learned Reference Court) preferred cross objections in all the appeals under Section 41 Rule 22 CPC against the impugned award with a prayer that the cross objection(s) be allowed and impugned award passed by the learned Reference Court be suitably modified so as to bring the same in conformity with the provisions of the Act.

3. The facts giving rise to the instant appeals and cross objections are that Government of Himachal Pradesh issued notification for acquisition of land measuring 37-16-01, situated in Muhal Sanyard, Tehsil and District Mandi, H.P., and the said notification was published in Rajpatra on 17.08.1999 and also in news-papers, i.e., Divya Himachal and Virpartap on 10.09.1999. Subsequently, notification under Sections 6 and 7 of the Act was issued on 26.07.2000 and the same was published in Rajpatra on 07.08.2000 and also in two daily newspapers, i.e., Dainik Virpartap and Ajit Samachar on 14.08.2000. Ultimately, the Land Acquisition Collector determined the value of various types of land as under:

Classification of the LandRate per Bigha
Barani bagicha phaldarRs. 4,05,280/-
Barani abalRs. 3,09,026/-
Barani doamRs. 2,53,300/-
Banjar kadeemRs. 75,990/-
KaraterRs. 60,792/-

4. On the basis of the above valuation, the Land Acquisition Collector awarded compensation of Rs.81,740/- for forest trees and Rs.2,47,876/- for fruit trees. The total compensation awarded to the petitioners/claimants was to the extent of Rs.1,24,59,550/-.

5. The petitioners/claimants feeling aggrieved filed present reference petitions under Section 18 of the Act before the learned Reference Court below for enhancement of the compensation and the learned Reference Court, after considering all the material, passed the impugned award, dated 16.08.2011, whereby the petitioners/claimants were held entitled for enhanced compensation at the rate of Rs.12,741/- per biswa qua the acquired land alongwith solatium, additional amount of compensation and interest etc..

6. The petitioners/claimants still feeling dissatisfied, preferred the instant appeals with a prayer that the appeals be allowed by modifying the impugned award, passed in their petitions and the market value of their acquired land be assessed as not less than Rs.35,000/- per biswa, irrespective of the classification. Conversely, cross-objector, i.e., H.P. Housing & Urban Development Authority, preferred cross-objections in all the appeals with a prayer that the cross objection(s) be allowed and impugned award passed by the learned Reference Court be suitably modified

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top