Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
JIYA LAL BHARDWAJ
Gulab Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of H.P – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, J.
The petitioner has filed the instant petition, praying therein for the following substantive reliefs:-
“(i) That the Respondent may kindly be directed to treat Petitioner to have been regularized /promoted to the post of Tehsildar (Class I Gazetted) on regular basis w.e.f. 08.01.2014 when he was promoted on ad hoc basis (Annexure P-2) against 2014 vacancies in pursuance of promotion order dated 21st June, 2019 (Annexure P-7) with all consequential benefits including retiral.
ii) That last para of impugned Notification dated 21st June, 2019 (Annexure P-7) may kindly be declared null and void and the same may kindly be quashed and set aside qua the Petitioner.”
2. Shorn of unnecessary details, the brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed as Clerk with the respondents on 01.12.1980 and promoted as Naib Tehsildar w.e.f. 30th December, 2008. Thereafter, vide Notification dated 16.07.2013, the respondents were pleased to order the transfer/posting of few of the Naib Tehsildars, working in the Revenue Department, Himachal Pradesh, against the post of Tehsildars, to work in their existing scale and the petitioner who was working as Naib Te
Petitioner entitled to retrospective benefits from promotion date due to having performed duties in the post, despite retirement status; denial of benefits ruled arbitrary.
Promotion in public service must adhere to seniority principles, and arbitrary actions undermining this principle are impermissible.
The right to be considered for promotion is a fundamental right, but there is no absolute right to promotion itself, which becomes effective only upon assumption of duties.
An employee has a fundamental right to be considered for promotion, but not a right to retrospective promotion unless clearly justified by rules or exceptional circumstances.
Promotions take effect from the date granted, not from the date of vacancy, and retrospective seniority cannot be assigned.
Point of Law : In case of a notional promotion from retrospective date, it cannot entitle the employee to arrears of salary as the incumbent has not worked in the promotional post.
(1) Promotion – Promotion is effective from the date it is granted and not from the date when vacancy occurs on subject post or when the post itself is created – There is no fundamental right to prom....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
