IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
RAKESH KAINTHLA
Lovkesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of HP – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rakesh Kainthla, J.
The petitioner has filed the present petition for seeking regular bail in FIR No. 91 of 2025, dated 11.7.2025, registered at Police Station Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 109 (1), 126(2), 115(2) and 117(1) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS).
2. It has been asserted that, as per the prosecution, the victim had parked his vehicle bearing registration No. HP-54C-0421 near his house on 11.7.2025. The accused asked the informant and the victim to transport the sand, but they declined. The accused threatened to damage the windscreen with the hammer if the sand was not transported. The victim tried to stop the accused, but the accused slapped him. The accused inflicted a hammer blow on the victim’s head. The victim was taken to the hospital. The matter was reported to the police. The police registered the FIR and investigated the matter. The police arrested the petitioner. The allegations made against him are false. The petitioner would abide by the terms and conditions that the Court may impose. Hence, it was prayed that the present petition be allowed and the petitioner be released on bail.
3. The p
State of Rajasthan v. Balchand
Gudikanti Narasimhulu v. Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P.
Bail denied in attempt to murder via hammer blow to head causing fracture; gravity of offence, severe punishment (life imprisonment), and witness tampering risk paramount despite no blood on weapon.
Pushing a person causing fall and death from head injury does not prima facie constitute offence under Section 103(1) without attributable knowledge of likely death; bail granted as added sections ba....
In serious charges like murder, bail cannot be granted based on trial delays; the nature of the offence dictates the court's discretion over bail.
The court emphasized that bail should be denied in serious offences like rape, highlighting the severity of the charge, nature of evidence, and potential for witness tampering as critical considerati....
The court affirmed that in serious offenses, circumstantial evidence and severity of potential punishment must prevail in bail considerations, denying the petitioner's release amid serious accusation....
The court ruled that severity of the charges and substantial evidence against the petitioner justified denial of bail, emphasizing the need to safeguard the judicial process. Evidence indicated likel....
The court emphasized that bail should not be denied without substantial evidence of interference with justice, allowing conditions to safeguard the process.
Bail denied in heinous robbery conspiracy case due to prima facie involvement via stolen property possession, firearms recovery, and mobile location data, given offence severity punishable by life im....
Bail denied in rape of intellectually disabled victim as prima facie case established by corroborated victim statement, medical evidence, site blood stains; heinous offence with life imprisonment pun....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.