SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(HP) 279

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
AJAY MOHAN GOEL, J.
Anant Ram – Appellant 
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and Others – Respondents
CWP No. 3575 of 2021
Decided On : 19-03-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sourav Rattan
For the Respondents: Pushpinder Jaswal, Onkar Jairath

Date of birth declared at service entry is conclusive unless corrected within two years; belated claims with certificates obtained just before superannuation after nearly 20 years not permissible.

Headnote:(A) Himachal Pradesh Financial Rules, 1971 - Chapter-VII - Note 1 (d) (1) - Declaration of age at time of or for entry into Government service deemed conclusive against servant unless correction applied within 2 years from entry - No application made within time even from regularization date - Certificates procured just before superannuation (month of retirement) not entertained to alter service record - Retirement on basis of recorded date of birth upheld. (Paras 8,9,10)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner joined as daily wage labourer in 2003, services regularized in 2012 based on documents showing date of birth as 01.07.1963. Obtained school leaving certificate and age certificate in June 2021 showing 12.11.1965, challenged superannuation order dated 08.06.2021 retiring on 30.06.2021.

Findings of Court:
Petition dismissed; superannuation valid as per service record date of birth supported by initial documents.

Issues: Whether belated request supported by recently obtained certificates permits correction of date of birth entered nearly two decades earlier at initial engagement and nine years post-regularization.

Ratio Decidendi: Correction of recorded age must be sought within two years from entry into service; failure to do so, especially with documents procured at fag end before retirement, demonstrates no merit in challenging retirement.

Result: Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. dispute over petitioner's dob causing premature retirement claim (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. belated dob correction request challenged as untimely (Para 4 , 5)
3. initial dob documents accepted; new certificates procured late (Para 6 , 7)
4. dob declaration conclusive unless corrected within two years (Para 8)
5. no timely application; superannuation based on service record valid (Para 9 , 10)
6. petition dismissed for lack of merit (Para 11)

JUDGMENT :

AJAY MOHAN GOEL, J.

1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has, inter alia, prayed for the following reliefs:-

“(i) Issue a writ of certiorari or direction in the nature of writ of certiorari quashing, setting aside office order dated 08.06.2021 whereby the petitioner has been directed to be considered as retired on 30.06.2021.

(ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or direction in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to continue working at, Sub Divisional Office, HPPWD, Haripurdhar, Sirmaur, H.P.”

2. The case of the petitioner is that he joined as a labourer in the Himachal Pradesh Public Works Department at Haripurdhar, District Sirmaur, H.P., on daily wage basis in the year 2003. His services were regularised in the month of July, 2012. At the time of joining, the petitioner submitted Panchayat record, in which, his Date of Birth was mentioned as 01.07.1963. He did not realise that this was not his correct Date of Birth, as his actual Date of Birth was 12.11.1965. It is further the contention of the petitioner that later on, when he approached the Authorities for the correction of his Date of Birth in the service record, the same was not taken into consideration and he stands retired on the basis of his incorrect Date of Birth. It is in this backdrop that the petition has been filed.

3. The stand of the State, on the other hand, is that the petitioner initially joined as a Beldar, in the year 2003 and his services were regularized w.e.f. 31.03.2012. The petitioner accepted his regularisation without any protest and produced the requisite documents in original alongwith Birth Certificate, which was issued by Panchayat Sahayak, Gram Gehal, Block Sangrah, District Sirmaur, H.P. in terms whereof, his Date of Birth was 01.07.1963. It is further the stand of the respondents that in light of the said Date of Birth of the petitioner, he was correctly retired on attaining the age of superannuation on 30.06.2021. It is further the stand of the respondents that the petitioner armed with a School Leaving Certificate, issued by Government Primary School, Gehal, dated 08.06.2021 and a Date of Certificate issued by Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Gehal, Development Block, Sangrah, District Sirmaur, H.P. has filed this petition, claiming retirement on the strength of the Date of Birth mentioned therein just to procure undue benefit.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner argued that the Date of Birth which was earlier entered in the service record of the petitioner was erroneously entered and when he realized this mistake, he obtained a School Leaving Certificate on 08.06.2021, in which his correct Date of Birth was mentioned, i.e. 12.11.1965, but despite his request to enter the same in the service record, the respondents did not do the needful and thus, his superannuation on the strength of the earlier Date of Birth entered in his service record, is bad in law. Learned Counsel, accordingly, prayed that the retirement order of the petitioner be set aside and respondents be directed to allow him to continue in service on the strength of School Leaving Certificate dated 08.06.2021.

5. On the other hand, learned Additional Advocate General submitted that the Date of Birth in the service record of the petitioner is the one which he himself got recorded. He further argued that if there was any discrepancy therein, he should have had got the same corrected within two years as from the date of joining of service and if not as from the date of initial joining on dai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top