SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 211

SANJAY DWIVEDI
Rajdev Mishra – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


ORDER

1. By the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 3.2.2021 (Annexure-P/2) whereby the petitioner is shown to be retired on attaining the age of 62 years; the said order also contains the date of birth of the employees retiring within a period of 24 months.

2. In the order dated 3.2.2021, name of the petitioner is shown at Sr.No.33 and his date of birth is shown as 1.5.1962, which has been taken from the date of birth recorded in service book.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the mark-sheets of 5th and 10th class and also in his Aadhar Card and PAN Card, the correct date of birth is shown as 15.08.1962. As per the petitioner, on 25.10.2022, he represented the matter to the Superintendent of Police, Shahdol; his representation is available on record as Annexure-P/3. Thereafter, is case was recommended by the Superintendent of Police to the Finance Officer, Police Headquarters, Bhopal. The Finance Officer further returned the matter to the Superintendent of Police saying that the date of birth recorded in the service book cannot be changed unless there is an order of the Court because as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top