SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(HP) 282

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Virender Singh, J.
Vikas Bansal - Applicant
Versus
Directorate of Enforcement (ED) - Respondent
CrMP(M) No. 3041 of 2025
Decided On : 12-03-2026

Advocate Appeared:
For the Applicant :Mr. Ajay Kochhar, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Swati Sharma, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Advocate (through Video Conferencing), with Mr. Ajeet Singh Saklani & Mr. Surila Sangam, Advocates, and Mr. Vikash Kumar, Assistant Director, ED.

PMLA Section 45 twin conditions relaxable by constitutional courts where voluminous evidence delays trial unreasonably, prolonged custody violates Article 21 speedy trial right, ensuring bail despite economic offence gravity.

Headnote:(A) Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 - Sections 3, 4, 45 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 483 - Bail during trial pendency - Predicate offence under IPC Sections 409, 419, 465, 466, 471, 420, 120-B and PC Act Sections 13(1)(c),(d), 13(2) - Fraudulent scholarship claims for bogus students generating proceeds of crime through controlled accounts and cash withdrawals - Applicant involved in operations and claims - Arrest after complaint with cognizance taken - 107 witnesses, 63749 documents - Investigation open - Twin conditions under Section 45 satisfied prima facie as not guilty and unlikely to commit offence with conditions - Rigours relax where trial unlikely soon due to volume, prolonged custody violates Article 21 speedy trial - Bail granted with conditions. (Paras 27-50)

(B) Constitution of India - Article 21 - Speedy trial and liberty - Prolonged incarceration without trial commencement impermissible even in economic offences - Documentary heavy case reduces tampering risk - Parity with co-accused on bail applicable - Selective arrests by agency noted - No flight risk given roots and compliance. (Paras 30-48)

Facts of the case:
Applicant Vice Chairman of institutions sought bail in money laundering prosecution from predicate scholarship fraud where claims submitted for ineligible students, funds credited to student accounts diverted via pre-signed instruments to trusts under control, withdrawn in cash. Raids, arrests in predicate; charge sheets filed. Searches by agency; complaint and supplements against applicant and others. Prior cooperation; arrest post another officer's corruption case. Lower bail rejected; parity with co-accused bailed by court.

Findings of Court:
Applicant enlarged on bail on personal bond Rs.2,00,000/- with two sureties, subject to conditions: regular court attendance, no evidence tamper, no inducement/threats, no foreign travel sans permission, monthly affidavit no new cases.

Issues: Satisfaction of Section 45 twin conditions; trial delay impact with voluminous evidence; parity entitlement; arrest propriety post agency officer trap.

Ratio Decidendi: Constitutional courts exercise power under Article 21 to relax Section 45 PMLA rigours where no reasonable trial conclusion prospect, custody exceeds substantial sentence part, violating speedy trial; parity holds despite role differences at bail stage; economic offences serious but not equated to heinous crimes warranting indefinite detention.

Result: Bail application allowed.

Table of Content
1. ecir basis: predicate offence scholarship fraud investigation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
2. arrest alleged vengeful post-io bribery complaint. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
3. bail grounds: parity, delay, voluminous evidence. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
4. applicant's role in bogus claims, proceeds laundering. (Para 24)
5. pmla section 45 twin conditions for bail. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
6. trial delay justifies bail despite pmla rigours. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)
7. constitutional courts override statutory bail restrictions. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38)
8. twin conditions satisfied by prolonged custody, parity. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49)
9. bail granted with stringent conditions. (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55)
JUDGMENT :
Virender Singh, J.

Applicant-Vikas Bansal has filed the present application, under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘BNSS’), with a prayer to release him, on bail, during the pendency of the trial, pending before the learned Special Judge (PMLA), Shimla, arising out of case No. ECIR/SHSZO/04/2019, dated 19.07.2019, registered with the Enforcement Directorate Office (ED), Sub-Zonal Office, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, under Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as ‘PMLA’).

2. According to the applicant, the said ECIR was registered on the basis of the source information of case FIR No. 133 of 2018, registered under Sections 409, 419, 465, 466 and 477 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as ‘IPC’), with Police Station East, Shimla, H.P. The investigation of the said case was entrusted to CBI, and a case, vide RC 0962019S0002, dated 7th May, 2019, was registered by CBI/ACB, Shimla, under , 419, 465, 466 and 471 . Since, Sections 419 and 471 were the scheduled offences, as defined under the PMLA, as, such, the present ECIR was registered by the respondent-ED.

3. It is the further case of the applicant that after the registration of RC 0962019S0002, dated 7th May, 2019, by the CBI, raids were conducted at 22 private institutions, including Himalayan Group of Professional Institutions (hereinafter referred to as ‘HGPI’) and Apex Group of Professional Institutions (hereinafter referred to as ‘AGPI’), which had applied for and received post matric scholarship scheme for SC, ST, OBC students of Himachal Pradesh and the records were seized.

4. The applicant is stated to be the Vice Chairman of HGPI and AGPI. The applicant is also stated to be one of the Trustees of Maa Saraswati Educational Trust and People Welfare Educational Trust.

5. According to the applicant, during the course of investigation, in the aforesaid RC, he was arrested by the CBI on 8th April, 2022, and was later on, released on bail, by this Court, vide order, dated 9th May, 2022, passed, in CrMP (M) No. 856 of 2022.

6. As per the further case of the applicant, after investigation, the CBI has filed different charge sheets in the Court of Special Judge (CBI), Shimla, and the applicant has been arrayed as accused, alongwith eight other persons, in one of the cases, which has been filed in the Court of learned Special Judge (CBI), Shimla, on 18th April, 2022, under Section 120-B read with Sections 409 and 471 IPC and Section 13(2) read with (1) (c) and (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act (hereinafter referred to as ‘PC Act’).

7. As per the applicant, the ED conducted searches under Section 17 of the PMLA on 29th August, 2023, at various premises of the applicant, including the residential premises of his brother Rajnish Bansal, who was Chairman of HGPI and AGPI and took into possession the relevant documents.

8. According to the applicant, he was summoned only once on 5th November, 2019, by the then Investigating Officer. The applicant joined the investigation and submitted all the documents and material related to the present ECIR.

9. It is the case























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top