SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(HP) 303

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Virender Singh, J.
Chote Khan @ Chotu - Applicant
Versus
State of H.P. - Respondent
Cr. MP(M) No. 204 of 2026
Decided On : 23-03-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant :Mr. Vijender Katoch, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Tejasvi Sharma, Addl. A.G. with Mr. Rohit Sharma and Ms. Ayushi Negi, Deputy Advocate General.

Co-accused's police custody disclosures inadmissible against applicant in NDPS cases; mere call detail records between co-villagers insufficient to deny bail; parity with released co-accused entitles grant of bail during trial pendency.

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 20, 25 and 29 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita - Section 483 - Bail application during trial pendency - No recovery effected from applicant - Involvement alleged solely on basis of co-accused disclosure in police custody, held inadmissible against co-accused as confessional statements to police officers barred under Evidence Act Section 25, per Supreme Court ruling - Mere call detail records between co-villagers, being metadata without conversation substance, insufficient to connect applicant to crime or deny bail, evidentiary value to be determined at trial - Applicant entitled to bail on ground of parity with co-accused already released on bail. (Paras 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14)

(B) Evidence - Confessional statements under NDPS Act - Recorded by police officers in custody, inadmissible for conviction. (Para 9)

Facts of the case:
Police party on patrolling intercepted vehicle, recovered 538 grams charas from dashboard in presence of witnesses, occupants arrested. Later, one accused identified recovery spot and led to supplier co-accused from whom 840 grams charas recovered. Supplier co-accused disclosed applicant's involvement via phone instructions, supported by call details. Applicant arrested later with no direct recovery. Investigation complete, charge-sheet filed, trial listed for prosecution witnesses. Previous bail application dismissed, co-accused granted bail.

Findings of Court:
Applicant directed to be released on bail on furnishing personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of like amount, subject to conditions including regular court attendance, no tampering with evidence, no threats to witnesses, no leaving country without permission.

Issues: Whether co-accused disclosure in police custody and call detail records sufficient to deny bail; entitlement to bail on parity.

Ratio Decidendi: Disclosures by co-accused in police custody inadmissible against applicant; phone talks between co-villagers natural, call records provide only metadata like caller ID and cell details, not conversation content; insufficient at bail stage to rebut presumption of innocence; parity applicable.

Result: Bail application allowed.

Table of Content
1. bail sought on innocence, no recovery, parity grounds. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. charas recovery from vehicle leads to arrests, applicant linked via disclosure. (Para 8)
3. co-accused custodial confessions inadmissible per tofan singh. (Para 9)
4. cdrs insufficient without content, value tested at trial. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
5. parity with released co-accused entitles bail. (Para 14)
6. bail granted with personal bond, sureties, conditions. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)

JUDGMENT :

Virender Singh, J.

Applicant has filed the present application, under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (hereinafter referred to as ‘the BNSS’) for releasing him, on bail, during the pendency of the trial, arising out of FIR No. 127 of 2025, dated 19.6.2025, registered under Sections 20, 25 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘ND & PS’ Act), with Police Station, Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P.

2. According to the applicant, he is innocent person and has falsely been implicated and arrested, in the above noted case, and has no concern whatsoever with the offence, for which, he has been arrested by the Police.

3. According to the applicant, no recovery has been effected from him. It is further pleaded by him that except the present case, no other case has been registered against him.

4. According to the further case of the applicant, investigation of the present case is complete.

5. The applicant has tried his luck by moving similar application, before the learned Special Judge- Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P., however, the same was dismissed on 3.9.2025.

6. Learned counsel for the applicant has prayed for the relief of bail on the ground of parity, as the co- accused Harsh, Akshit and Dushyant have been released on bail, on 19.7.2025/21.7.2025.

7. On the basis of above facts, the applicant, through his counsel, has given certain undertakings, for which, he is ready to abide by, in case, ordered to be released on bail.

8. When, put to notice, the Police has filed the status report, disclosing therein, that on 19.6.2025, HC Dinesh Singh No. 46, alongwith other police officials, was on patrolling duty and on duty to put picketing, as well as, to detect the crimes relating to excise and narcotics. The Police party left the Police Line, Nurpur at 2 a.m. Thereafter, they had conducted patrolling in Jassur-Chhatroli-Nagabadi and when, they had put picketing and started checking the vehicles moving from Jassur to Pathankot, they noticed that two local persons were coming from Kandwal Barrier. On inquiry, they disclosed their names as Sucha Singh, S/o Chidu Ram, R/o Ward No. 2, Village and P.O.Kandwal, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. and Dilsher Singh, S/o Late Sh. Nasib Singh, R/o Village & P.O. Kandwal, Tehsil Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P.

8.1 As per the stand of the Police, at about, 5:45 a.m., a grey coloured vehicle was noticed moving from Jassur to Pathankot side, which was signaled to stop by Constable Ashok Kumar No. 299. Consequently, the driver of the vehicle stopped the car. The registration number of the vehicle was found to be DL 10 CD 9222. Three persons were found sitting in the said vehicle. After disclosing his identity, HC Dinesh directed the driver to produce relevant documents, upon which, the driver became perplexed and could not give satisfactory answer. His activities raised suspicion in the mind of HC Dinesh. As such, he called Sucha Singh and Dilsher Singh and associated them as independent witnesses. In the presence of these witnesses, all the occupants were directed to alighten down from the vehicle and their names and addresses were inquired.

8.2 On inquiry, the occupants of the car disclosed their names as Harsh Dogra, S/o Naresh Dogra, Akshit Ranchal, S/o Harish Ranchal and Dushyant, S/o Ashwani Kumar. All the aforesaid persons could not give any satisfactory answers. The vehicle was searched.

8.3 On searching the vehicle,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top