Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
ROMESH VERMA
State of H.P. though Pr. Secy. (PW) to the Govt. of H.P. – Appellant
Versus
Purnu Devi (deceased) through her LRs – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Romesh Verma, J.
CMP (M) No. 59 of 2025
The present application has been filed for condonation of delay in filing the present appeal. It has been averred in the application that the judgment and decree as passed by the learned Additional District Judge-I, Mandi, HP is under challenge. Certified copy of the judgment was applied on 13.12.2024, which was attested on 28.12.2025 and delivered on 01.01.2025. Thereafter, the same was received from the District Attorney, Mandi, H.P. and thereafter, it remained pending in different channels and in the said process delay of 174 days has been occurred.
The learned Counsel for the non-applicant has submitted that he has no objection, in case, the present application is allowed.
In view of the averments as made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit and keeping in view the fact that the learned counsel for the non-applicants have no objection, in case delay is condoned, the present application is allowed and the delay of 174 days in filing the appeal is condoned.
Application stands disposed off.
RSA No. 80 of 2026
The present appeal arises out of the judgment and decree, dated 12.12.2024 as passed by the learned Additio
Welfare state cannot deprive property without due process and compensation for public use like road construction; adverse possession, delay, laches, estoppel unavailable despite long delay as continu....
State cannot deprive citizen of property for public use without due process and compensation under Article 300A; welfare state barred from adverse possession claim; delay/laches inapplicable to conti....
State cannot dispossess individuals of property or utilize land for public purpose without legal acquisition and just compensation, reinforcing constitutional property rights.
Welfare State cannot deprive property without due process and compensation under Article 300A; adverse possession unavailable to State; delay/laches no bar to suit for continuing deprivation of prope....
The right to property is a constitutional right that cannot be taken without due process of law, and plaintiffs are entitled to compensation for land used by the State for public purposes.
State must compensate citizens for property utilized for public projects under due process. Delay in claiming rights does not preclude entitlement if injustice persists.
State cannot utilize private land for roads without due process and compensation; unsubstantiated oral consent rejected; welfare state barred from adverse possession; concurrent findings upheld absen....
State cannot deprive individuals of property without due process and must provide just compensation if property is utilized for public use.
Welfare State cannot deprive property without due process and compensation under Article 300A; cannot plead adverse possession or delay against owners seeking payment for land used in public road con....
State cannot deprive property owner of land for public road without due process of acquisition and compensation under Article 300A; defenses of delay, acquiescence, estoppel, and adverse possession r....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
